Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Eddie Farnsworth's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 95%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score (State Legislatures) 98%
2014 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 100%
2013 Goldwater Institute - Positions 70%
2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Tax and Budget 93%
2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Regulation 86%
2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Constitutional Government 86%
2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Education 71%
2012 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 86%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Tax and Budget 86%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 75%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Regulation 79%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Constitutional Government 93%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Education 93%
2008 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions on Conservative Issues 93
2008 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 79%
2008 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2008 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 69%
2008 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 80%
2008 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 76%
2007 Goldwater Institute - Positions 66%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions on Conservative Issues 71
2006 Goldwater Institute - Positions 72%
2005 Goldwater Institute - Positions 75%
2004 Goldwater Institute - Positions (State Legislators) 67%
2003 Goldwater Institute - Positions 71%

Employment and Affirmative Action

2014 Stonewall Democrats of Arizona - Positions 1%

Environment

2015 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions %
2014 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 6%
2013 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0%
2012 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 16%
2012 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 22%
2012 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0%
2011 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 13%
2011 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 16%
2011 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0%
2008 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 16
2008 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F
2007 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 25%
2007 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F
2006 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2006 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F
2005 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 8%
2005 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions 0%
2004 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 45%
2004 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F
2003 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 23%
2003 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F
2002 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2002 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F
2001 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 11%
2001 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation F

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top