or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Sharon Y. Runner

Sharon Y. Runner's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Sharon Y. Runner

Business and Consumers

2012 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 58%
2012 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Issues 25%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 15%
2011 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2011 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2008 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 100%
2008 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 90
2007 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 93
2007 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 100
2007 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 27
2007 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 20%
2006 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 94%
2006 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 90
2006 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2006 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 11
2006 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Advocacy 83
2005-2006 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 100%
2005 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2005 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 12%
2004 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2004 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 27%
2003-2004 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 100%
2003-2004 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2003 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2003 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 29%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 43
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 70%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 67%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 68%
2007 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 14
2007 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 17
2007 California Communities United Institute - Positions 31
2007 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 22
2007 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 30
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 48
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 14
2006 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 20
2006 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions on Civil Rights & Equality 7%
2006 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Underrepresented Group Issues 14
2006 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - LGBTI Rights Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 54
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 14
2006 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Economic Policy Score 4
2005-2006 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0
2005 Applied Research Center - Positions on Racial Justice 25
2005 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 31%
2005 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 11%
2005 Equality California - Positions 7%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 18%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 46%
2004 Applied Research Center - Positions 10%
2004 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 46%
2004 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 0%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 6%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 23%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 8%
2003 Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality - Positions 36%
2003 California Communities United Institute - Positions 23%
2003 Equality California - Positions 6%
1997-2003 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top