Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: California Park & Recreation Society

2011-2012 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican 64%
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 73%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 58%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 6 Richard Pan Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 9 Nancy Skinner Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 10 Bob Wieckowski Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 15 Jim Beall, Jr. Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 16 Shannon Grove Republican 70%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 23 Mike Morrell Republican 67%
CA State Senate 25 Anthony Portantino, Jr. Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 30 Holly Mitchell Democratic 91%
CA State Senate 35 Steven Bradford Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 38 Brian Jones Republican 73%
CA State Senate 39 Toni Atkins Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 40 Ben Hueso Democratic 100%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 100%
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic 100%
CA Mayor At-Large Don Wagner 75%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries 83%
CA Supervisor 4 Curt Hagman 84%
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation 100%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 100%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield 100%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. 100%
CA Council Member Ward 3 Jose Solorio 100%
CA Treasurer Fiona Ma Democratic 100%
Katcho Achadjian 83%
Luis Alejo 100%
Michael Allen 100%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Joel Anderson 67%
Bill Berryhill 73%
Tom Berryhill 72%
Sam Blakeslee 91%
Martin Block 100%
Susan Bonilla 100%
Joan Buchanan 100%
Betsy Butler 100%
Charles Calderon 100%
Ron Calderon 100%
Nora Campos 100%
Anthony Cannella 82%
Amina Carter 100%
Wesley Chesbro 100%
Connie Conway 75%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Mike Davis 100%
Kevin de Leon 100%
Roger Dickinson 100%
Tim Donnelly 64%
Robert Dutton 75%
Bill Emmerson 73%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 91%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 89%
Paul Fong 100%
Felipe Fuentes 100%
Jean Fuller 73%
Warren Furutani 100%
Beth Gaines 73%
Ted Gaines 73%
Martin Garrick 60%
Mike Gatto 100%
Richard Gordon 100%
Jeff Gorell 75%
Linda Halderman 78%
Isadore Hall III 100%
Loni Hancock 100%
Diane Harkey 70%
Tom Harman 57%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Ed Hernandez 100%
Roger Hernandez 100%
Alyson Huber 100%
Robert Huff 75%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Steve Knight 75%
Ricardo Lara 100%
Mark Leno 100%
Carol Liu 100%
Dan Logue 60%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Allan Mansoor 67%
Tony Mendoza 90%
Jeff Miller 75%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 100%
Brian Nestande 83%
Chris Norby 83%
Kristin Olsen 83%
Fran Pavley 100%
Henry Perea 100%
John Pérez 100%
Manuel Pérez 100%
Michael Rubio 92%
Sharon Runner 67%
Jim Silva 75%
Cameron Smyth 88%
Tony Strickland 75%
Sandré Swanson 100%
David Valadao 75%
Mimi Walters 75%
Das Williams 100%
Lois Wolk 100%
Roderick Wright 92%
Mark Wyland 70%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top