Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Republican Liberty Caucus of California

2011 Overall Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican 78%
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 21%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 62%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 17%
CA U.S. House 21 David Valadao Republican 83%
CA U.S. House 25 Steve Knight Republican 86%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 21%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 18%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 26%
CA U.S. House 45 Mimi Walters Republican 75%
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic 33%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 17%
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic 18%
CA Governor Jerry Brown, Jr. Democratic 36%
CA State Senate 1 Ted Gaines Republican 80%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 78%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 29%
CA State Senate 6 Richard Pan Democratic 19%
CA State Senate 8 Tom Berryhill Republican 75%
CA State Senate 9 Nancy Skinner Democratic 19%
CA State Senate 10 Bob Wieckowski Democratic 21%
CA State Senate 12 Anthony Cannella Republican 67%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 26%
CA State Senate 15 Jim Beall, Jr. Democratic 28%
CA State Senate 16 Jean Fuller Republican 77%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 24%
CA State Senate 22 Ed Hernandez Democratic 20%
CA State Senate 23 Mike Morrell Republican 83%
CA State Senate 24 Kevin de Leon Democratic 15%
CA State Senate 25 Anthony Portantino, Jr. Democratic 21%
CA State Senate 30 Holly Mitchell Democratic 31%
CA State Senate 32 Tony Mendoza Democratic 26%
CA State Senate 33 Ricardo Lara Democratic 21%
CA State Senate 35 Steven Bradford Democratic 22%
CA State Senate 38 Joel Anderson Republican 80%
CA State Senate 39 Toni Atkins Democratic 21%
CA State Senate 40 Ben Hueso Democratic 19%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 15%
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic 17%
CA Mayor At-Large Don Wagner 72%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries 72%
CA Supervisor 4 Curt Hagman 69%
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation 25%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 21%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield 21%
CA Council Member 7 Felipe Fuentes 19%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. 18%
Katcho Achadjian 79%
Luis Alejo 19%
Michael Allen 22%
Elaine Alquist 25%
Tom Ammiano 21%
Bill Berryhill 76%
Sam Blakeslee 57%
Martin Block 21%
Susan Bonilla 29%
Joan Buchanan 26%
Betsy Butler 21%
Charles Calderon 24%
Ron Calderon 35%
Nora Campos 17%
Amina Carter 21%
Wesley Chesbro 24%
Connie Conway 74%
Ellen Corbett 17%
Mike Davis 24%
Roger Dickinson 22%
Tim Donnelly 79%
Robert Dutton 70%
Bill Emmerson 65%
Mike Eng 21%
Noreen Evans 20%
Mike Feuer 17%
Nathan Fletcher 62%
Paul Fong 21%
Warren Furutani 17%
Beth Gaines 81%
Martin Garrick 76%
Mike Gatto 28%
Richard Gordon 22%
Shannon Grove 74%
Linda Halderman 79%
Isadore Hall III 22%
Loni Hancock 20%
Diane Harkey 81%
Tom Harman 65%
Mary Hayashi 22%
Roger Hernandez 19%
Alyson Huber 41%
Robert Huff 67%
Brian Jones 78%
Christine Kehoe 18%
Mark Leno 17%
Carol Liu 18%
Dan Logue 85%
Bonnie Lowenthal 21%
Fiona Ma 19%
Allan Mansoor 88%
Jeff Miller 76%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 28%
Brian Nestande 71%
Chris Norby 90%
Kristin Olsen 81%
Fran Pavley 17%
Henry Perea 17%
John Pérez 22%
Manuel Pérez 19%
Michael Rubio 27%
Sharon Runner 68%
Jim Silva 79%
Cameron Smyth 71%
Jose Solorio 22%
Tony Strickland 72%
Sandré Swanson 19%
Das Williams 21%
Lois Wolk 22%
Roderick Wright 30%
Mark Wyland 75%
Mariko Yamada 19%
Leland Yee 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top