Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund

2004 Lifetime Score

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican A
CA U.S. House 4 Tom McClintock Republican A
CA U.S. House 23 Kevin McCarthy Republican A+
CA U.S. House 27 Judy Chu Democratic F
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic F
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic F
CA Supervisor 2 Mark Ridley-Thomas F-
CA Supervisor 3 Wilma Chan F
CA Supervisor 3 Sheila Kuehl F
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation C-
CA Council Member 5 Paul Koretz F-
CA Council Member At-Large Alan Nakanishi A
Richard Ackerman A
Gregory Aghazarian A
Roy Ashburn A
James Battin A
John Benoit A
Rudy Bermúdez D
Russell Bogh A
Ron Calderon F
John Campbell III A
Joseph Canciamilla C+
Edward Chavez F
David Cogdill A
Rebecca Cohn F
Dave Cox A+
Lynn Daucher B
Robert Dutton A+
Mervyn Dymally F
Dario Frommer F
Bonnie Garcia B
Jackie Goldberg F
Loni Hancock F
Tom Harman A
Ray Haynes, Jr. A
Jerome Horton D
Shirley Horton B
Guy Houston A
Ross Johnson ?
Betty Karnette F
Richard Keene A
Christine Kehoe F
John Laird F
Jay La Suer A+
Mark Leno D
Robert Leslie A
Lloyd Levine F
Sally Lieber F
Carol Liu F
Michael Machado F
Abel Maldonado C
Bob Margett A
Barbara Matthews C
Bill Maze A
Cindy Montañez F
Dennis Lee Mountjoy A
Joseph Nation F-
Gloria Negrete McLeod B+
Fabian Núñez D
Jenny Oropeza D
Nicole Parra B
Fran Pavley F
Don Perata F
George Plescia A
Keith Stuart Richman B
Sharon Runner A
Simón Salinas D
Jack Scott F-
Todd Spitzer A+
Tom Torlakson F
Edward Vincent F
Lois Wolk C
Mark Wyland A
Leland Yee F

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top