Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association of Social Workers - California Chapter

2012 "Legislative Scorecard"

State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican 20%
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 8%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 79%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 93%
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic 87%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 13%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 93%
CA State Senate 6 Richard Pan Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 9 Nancy Skinner Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 10 Bob Wieckowski Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 15 Jim Beall, Jr. Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 16 Shannon Grove Republican 14%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 23 Mike Morrell Republican 7%
CA State Senate 25 Anthony Portantino, Jr. Democratic 73%
CA State Senate 30 Holly Mitchell Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 35 Steven Bradford Democratic 80%
CA State Senate 38 Brian Jones Republican 7%
CA State Senate 39 Toni Atkins Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 40 Ben Hueso Democratic 100%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 100%
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic 93%
CA Mayor At-Large Don Wagner 20%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries 20%
CA Supervisor 4 Curt Hagman 13%
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation 87%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 100%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield 100%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. 100%
CA Council Member Ward 3 Jose Solorio 80%
CA Treasurer Fiona Ma Democratic 93%
Katcho Achadjian 20%
Luis Alejo 93%
Michael Allen 100%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Joel Anderson 20%
Bill Berryhill 21%
Tom Berryhill 20%
Sam Blakeslee 27%
Martin Block 93%
Susan Bonilla 100%
Jerry Brown, Jr. 67%
Joan Buchanan 93%
Betsy Butler 100%
Charles Calderon 100%
Ron Calderon 100%
Nora Campos 93%
Anthony Cannella 33%
Amina Carter 100%
Wesley Chesbro 100%
Connie Conway 7%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Mike Davis 100%
Kevin de Leon 100%
Roger Dickinson 100%
Tim Donnelly 7%
Robert Dutton 20%
Bill Emmerson 27%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 93%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 57%
Paul Fong 100%
Felipe Fuentes 100%
Jean Fuller 20%
Warren Furutani 93%
Beth Gaines 7%
Ted Gaines 20%
Martin Garrick 0%
Mike Gatto 100%
Richard Gordon 100%
Jeff Gorell 29%
Linda Halderman 13%
Isadore Hall III 93%
Loni Hancock 87%
Diane Harkey 7%
Tom Harman 21%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Ed Hernandez 93%
Roger Hernandez 94%
Alyson Huber 87%
Robert Huff 27%
Christine Kehoe 93%
Steve Knight 14%
Ricardo Lara 100%
Mark Leno 100%
Carol Liu 100%
Dan Logue 13%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Allan Mansoor 7%
Tony Mendoza 100%
Jeff Miller 13%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 100%
Brian Nestande 20%
Chris Norby 27%
Kristin Olsen 20%
Fran Pavley 73%
Henry Perea 86%
John Pérez 93%
Manuel Pérez 100%
Michael Rubio 67%
Sharon Runner 29%
Jim Silva 14%
Cameron Smyth 21%
Tony Strickland 30%
Sandré Swanson 100%
David Valadao 25%
Mimi Walters 13%
Das Williams 87%
Lois Wolk 87%
Roderick Wright 93%
Mark Wyland 25%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top