Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kim M. Norton's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (MN) - 25B, Democratic/Farmer/Labor

2014 Endorsements

Labor Unions

2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 90
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 89
2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 74%
2013-2014 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions (House) 89%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 89%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 59%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 88%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 50%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 89%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 100%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 60%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 84%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 81%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 58%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 95%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 94%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 80
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 75
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 40
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 83

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top