Card image cap

Curtis Oda's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

33%
2006
33%
2006
81%
2015
88%
2014
60%
2013
63%
2012
64%
2011
75%
2010
76%
2016
76%
2016
77%
2015
77%
2015
68%
2015
68%
2015
79%
2014
79%
2014
75%
2014
75%
2014
75%
2013
75%
2013
80%
2013
80%
2013
80%
2012
80%
2012
96%
2012
96%
2012
76%
2010
76%
2010
73%
2010
73%
2010
76%
2009
76%
2009
77%
2008
77%
2008
77%
2007
77%
2007
60%
2006
60%
2006
95%
2005
95%
2005
94%
2015
90%
2015
89%
2014
82%
2014
87%
2013
100%
2012
29%
2015
29%
2015
13%
2014
13%
2014
63%
2013
63%
2013
0%
2012
38%
2011
38%
2011
25%
2010
25%
2010
25%
2009
25%
2009
33%
2008
33%
2008
38%
2007
38%
2007
38%
2006
38%
2006
81%
2015
88%
2014
60%
2013
63%
2012
64%
2011
75%
2010
82%
2016
91%
2015
88%
2014
100%
2013
92%
2012
90%
2011
83%
2010
86%
2009
93%
2008
94%
2007
100%
2006
82%
2005
81%
2015
88%
2014
60%
2013
63%
2012
64%
2011
75%
2010
81%
2015
88%
2014
60%
2013
63%
2012
64%
2011
75%
2010
91%
2016
91%
2015
88%
2014
100%
2013
92%
2012
90%
2011
83%
2010
86%
2009
93%
2008
94%
2007
100%
2006
82%
2005
arrow_upward