Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Dan Logue's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Assembly (CA) - District 3, Republican

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 56%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 34%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 39%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 47%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 29%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 31%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 39%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Native Americans 67%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 79%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (House Only) 53%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 47%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 31
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 79%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 90%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 85%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 0%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 10%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 10%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 58%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 49%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 34%
2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 25%
2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 30%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 67%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 33%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 50%
2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 25%
2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score 0%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 39%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 79%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 56%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 39%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Native Americans 67%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (House Only) 53%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 34%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 47%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 29%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 47%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 31%
2013 Equality California - Positions 0%
2012 Equality California - Positions 0%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 31
2011 Equality California - Positions 0%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 58%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 10%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 0%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 49%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 10%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 34%
2010 Equality California - Positions 8%
2009 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top