Card image cap

John Linder's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Arts, Entertainment, and History

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

86%
2010
86%
2010
13%
2010
13%
2010
85%
2010
85%
2010
0%
2010
88%
2010
88%
2010
91%
2010
91%
2010
0%
2010
8%
2009
0%
2009
75%
2009
75%
2009
92%
2009
92%
2009
91%
2009
91%
2009
0%
2009
93%
2009
93%
2009
8%
2009
11%
2008
11%
2008
87.3%
2008
87.3%
2008
13%
2008
13%
2008
82%
2008
82%
2008
16%
2008
16%
2008
88%
2008
88%
2008
8%
2008
89%
2008
89%
2008
97%
2007
97%
2007
72%
2007
72%
2007
93.3%
2007
93.3%
2007
0%
2007
0%
2007
91%
2007
91%
2007
6.7%
2007
6.7%
2007
0%
2007
3%
2006
94%
2006
94%
2006
74%
2006
74%
2006
97%
2006
97%
2006
23%
2006
23%
2006
89.8%
2006
89.8%
2006
10.2%
2006
10.2%
2006
0%
2006
0%
2005
89%
2005
89%
2005
78%
2005
78%
2005
90%
2005
90%
2005
11%
2005
11%
2005
21%
2005
21%
2005
94%
2005
94%
2005
3%
2005
86%
2004
86%
2004
83%
2004
83%
2004
83%
2004
83%
2004
10%
2004
10%
2004
16%
2004
16%
2004
17%
2004
17%
2004
87%
2003
87%
2003
89%
2003
89%
2003
0%
2003
94%
2003
94%
2003
91%
2003
91%
2003
5%
2003
6%
2003
0%
2003
75%
2002
75%
2002
0%
2002
92%
2002
92%
2002
91%
2002
91%
2002
0%
2002
85%
2002
85%
2002
0%
2002
8%
2002
81%
2001
81%
2001
86%
2001
86%
2001
0%
2001
87%
2001
87%
2001
4%
2001
15%
2001
15%
2001
79%
2000
79%
2000
62%
2000
62%
2000
33%
2000
33%
2000
0%
2000
6%
2000
85%
2000
85%
2000
75%
1999
75%
1999
25%
1999
25%
1999
54%
1999
54%
1999
81%
1999
81%
1999
45%
1999
45%
1999
15%
1999
15%
1999
0%
1998
88%
1998
88%
1998
3%
1998
32%
1998
32%
1998
90%
1998
90%
1998
67%
1998
67%
1998
77%
1996
77%
1996
63%
1996
63%
1996
82%
1996
82%
1996
14%
1996
14%
1996
36%
1996
36%
1996
0%
2003
arrow_upward