Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Piyush 'Bobby' Amrit Jindal's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: Governor (LA), Republican

Business and Consumers

2007-2008 National Small Business Association - Positions 80%
2007-2008 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2006 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2006 Consumer Action - Positions 0%
2006 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2006 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 5%
2006 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2006 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 5%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 91%
2005-2006 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 80%
2005-2006 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 96%
2005-2006 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 88%
2005-2006 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Restaurant Association - Positions 90%
2005-2006 National Retail Federation - Positions 62%
2005-2006 National Small Business Association - Positions 82%
2005-2006 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 81%
2005-2006 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions on Population Stabilization 12%
2005 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 92%
2005 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 93%
2005 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2005 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 96%
2005 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 89%
1999-2006 National Ready Mixed Concrete Association - Positions 100%

Federal, State and Local Relations

2005-2006 National Association of Counties - Positions 65%

Labor Unions

2008 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%
2007-2008 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 33%
2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 25%
2007 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 7%
2007 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 72%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 0%
2007 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 60
2006 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 21%
2006 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0%
2006 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 16%
2006 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 50%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 11%
2006 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 16%
2006 United Auto Workers - Positions 8%
2005-2006 American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions 66%
2005-2006 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 33%
2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 16%
2005 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 8%
2005 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 27%
2005 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0%
2005 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 33%
2005 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 75%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 12%
2005 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 33%
2005 United Auto Workers - Positions 14%

Socially Conservative

2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 65%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 65%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 76%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 76%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 92%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 92%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 85%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 85%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 100%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2005 Family Research Council - Positions 92%
2005 Family Research Council - Positions 92%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 80%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 80%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 60%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 60%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 45%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 75%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 75%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 45%

Socially Liberal

2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions (Governors) 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions (Governors) 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 29%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 29%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 50%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 6%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 6%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 50%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 0%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 0%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Social Issues 20%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Social Issues 20%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 43%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 43%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 19%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 19%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top