Representative Thomas 'Tom' E. Price's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. House (GA) - District 6, Republican
View 2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 92% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 83% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 90% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 94% 2014 Conservative Review - Positions 78 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 87% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 73% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 80% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 86% 2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 100 2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 69% 2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 97% 2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 87% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 68% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 94% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 80 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 84% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 66% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 86% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 75% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 91% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 97% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 78% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 97% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 100% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 94% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 91% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 85% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 85% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 100% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 93% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 88% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 89% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 90% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 90% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 100% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 6 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 90% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 90% 2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 100% 2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 95% 2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 95.5% 2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 74% 2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100% 2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100 2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90% 2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 16 2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 74% 2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 100% 2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100% 2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 13 2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2007 GOPUSA - Positions 18% 2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 91.7% 2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72% 2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 67% 2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 92% 2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 89% 2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 25 2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 73% 2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 81.8% 2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 57% 2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97% 2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96% 2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 0 2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 80% 2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89% 2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 84% 2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 88% 2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 100% 2001-2002 Georgia Christian Alliance - Positions 75% 2001-2002 Georgia Conservative Coalition - Positions 75% 1999-2000 Georgia Christian Alliance - Positions 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.