Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Crime
State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 80%
Gary Ackerman 71%
Todd Akin 20%
Rodney Alexander 40%
Thomas Allen 80%
Rob Andrews 60%
Joe Baca, Sr. 56%
Spencer Bachus 38%
Brian Baird 60%
Richard Hugh Baker 40%
Cass Ballenger 40%
J. Gresham Barrett 20%
Roscoe Bartlett 30%
Charlie Bass 33%
Bob Beauprez 50%
Chris Bell 60%
Douglas Bereuter 56%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 88%
Marion Berry 70%
Judy Biggert 40%
Michael Bilirakis 40%
Tim Bishop 50%
Sherwood Boehlert 25%
John Boehner 40%
Henry Bonilla 40%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 30%
Mary Bono Mack 44%
Leonard Boswell 33%
Rick Boucher 40%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 33%
Henry Brown, Jr. 40%
Ginny Brown-Waite 60%
Max Burns 30%
Dan Burton 30%
Steve Buyer 50%
Dave Camp 30%
Chris Cannon 22%
Eric Cantor 40%
Dennis Cardoza 70%
Brad Carson 40%
Julia Carson 88%
Edward Case 67%
Mike Castle 50%
Chris Chocola 40%
Howard Coble 30%
Michael Collins 30%
Jerry Costello 40%
Christopher Cox 33%
Robert Cramer 50%
Philip Crane 40%
Barbara Cubin 30%
Randall Cunningham 40%
Artur Davis 60%
James Davis 50%
Jo Ann Davis 33%
Lincoln Davis 40%
Thomas Davis III 40%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 40%
James DeMint 14%
Peter Deutsch 55%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 40%
Norm Dicks 60%
John Dingell 56%
Calvin Dooley 60%
John Doolittle 30%
David Dreier 60%
Jennifer Dunn 40%
Chet Edwards 40%
Vern Ehlers 40%
Jo Ann Emerson 40%
Philip English 40%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Lane Evans 50%
Terry Everett 30%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 75%
Tom Feeney 40%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 100%
Mark Foley 60%
Harold Ford, Jr. 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 40%
Barney Frank 60%
Jonas Frost III 60%
Elton Gallegly 50%
Jim Gerlach 40%
Jim Gibbons 40%
Wayne Gilchrest 70%
Paul Gillmor 40%
Phil Gingrey 33%
Charlie Gonzalez 60%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 30%
Bart Gordon 40%
Porter Goss 40%
Mark Green 60%
James Greenwood 33%
Gilbert Gutknecht 38%
Ralph Hall 33%
Jane Harman 70%
Katherine Harris 40%
Melissa Hart 30%
Doc Hastings 40%
Robert Hayes 30%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 30%
Joel Hefley 40%
Wally Herger, Jr. 20%
Baron Hill 40%
Maurice Hinchey 67%
David Lee Hobson 40%
Joseph Hoeffel 50%
Pete Hoekstra 40%
Thomas Holden 50%
Rush Holt, Jr. 90%
Darlene Hooley 60%
John Nathan Hostettler 30%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 33%
Kenny Hulshof 30%
Duncan Hunter 50%
Henry Hyde 50%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 25%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Janklow 25%
William Jefferson 77%
William Lewis Jenkins 33%
Christopher John 33%
Nancy Johnson 60%
Tim Johnson 50%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Richard Keller 40%
Sue Kelly 40%
Mark Kennedy 40%
Patrick Kennedy 60%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 60%
Jack Kingston 22%
Gerald Kleczka 67%
Joseph Knollenberg 40%
James Kolbe 33%
Dennis Kucinich 77%
Ray LaHood 40%
Nicholas Lampson 70%
Tom Lantos 70%
Tom Latham 33%
Steve LaTourette 67%
James Leach 40%
Jerry Lewis 40%
Ron Lewis 33%
John Linder 30%
William Lipinski 50%
Denise Majette 77%
Don Manzullo 30%
Jim Marshall 50%
Jim Matheson 40%
Robert Matsui 60%
Carolyn McCarthy 60%
Karen McCarthy 77%
Thaddeus McCotter 44%
James McCrery III 33%
John McHugh 56%
CO Commissioner 2 Scott McInnis 38%
Mike McIntyre 63%
Buck McKeon 30%
Michael McNulty 70%
Martin Meehan 60%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 70%
Mike Michaud 60%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 67%
Gary Miller 22%
George Miller 63%
Brad Miller 50%
Alan Mollohan 70%
Dennis Moore 40%
Jim Moran, Jr. 67%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 20%
Sue Myrick 40%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 33%
Robert William Ney 40%
Anne Northup 40%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 22%
James Nussle 30%
Jim Oberstar 90%
Dave Obey 90%
John Olver 80%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 67%
Thomas William Osborne 40%
Doug Ose 20%
Major Owens 88%
Michael Oxley 44%
Ed Pastor 70%
Ron Paul 43%
Donald Payne 90%
John Peterson 40%
Tom Petri 60%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 40%
Todd Platts 40%
Richard Pombo 40%
Earl Pomeroy 40%
Jon Porter, Sr. 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top