Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Dayton's Voting Records on Issue: Senior Citizens

Office: Governor (MN), Democratic/Farmer/Labor

National Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
March 16, 2006 S Con Res 83 2007 Budget Resolution Joint Resolution Passed - Senate
(51 - 49)
Nay
Feb. 2, 2006 S Amdt 2730 Medicare Part D Amendment Motion Rejected - Senate
(52 - 45)
Yea
Nov. 17, 2005 S Amdt 2601 Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Amendment Motion Rejected - Senate
(51 - 47)
Yea
Nov. 3, 2005 S Amdt 2357 Medicare Premiums Amendment Amendment Rejected - Senate
(49 - 50)
Yea
Nov. 3, 2005 S Amdt 2371 Medicare Prescription Drug Amendment Motion Rejected - Senate
(51 - 48)
Yea
Nov. 3, 2005 S Amdt 2381 Prescription Drug Plan Amendment Motion Rejected - Senate
(43 - 56)
Yea
March 17, 2005 S Amdt 229 Medicaid Amendment Amendment Rejected - Senate
(49 - 51)
Nay
May 23, 2003 HR 2 Jobs and Economic Growth bill Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(51 - 50)
Nay

Executive Actions

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
April 23, 2012 SF 247 Relating to the Public Employee Insurance Program Vetoed - Executive
Veto

About the Selection and Description of Key Votes

Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Vote Smart provides a summary of the version of the bill text associated with each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the project's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. Each key vote selection is reviewed by the project's community of advisors, who are political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top
Back to top