Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Dayton's Voting Records on Issue: Housing and Property

Office: Governor (MN), Democratic/Farmer/Labor

National Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
Oct. 26, 2005 S Amdt 2194 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program Amendment Motion Rejected - Senate
(54 - 43)
Yea
Oct. 26, 2005 S Amdt 2253 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Funding Amendment Amendment Rejected - Senate
(46 - 53)
Nay
Oct. 20, 2005 HR 3058 Transportation, Treasury, HUD and Judiciary Appropriation Bill Passed - Senate
(93 - 1)
Yea
March 10, 2005 S 256 Bankruptcy Reform Bill Bill Passed - Senate
(74 - 25)
Nay
Nov. 8, 2001 HR 2620 Veterans Affairs and HUD Appropriations Act of 2002 Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(87 - 7)
Yea

Executive Actions

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
May 23, 2013 HF 677 Amends State Taxes Signed - Executive
Sign
May 7, 2012 SF 1717 Relating to the State Building Code Vetoed - Executive
Veto
March 5, 2012 HF 1467 Expands the Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense Vetoed - Executive
Veto
May 25, 2011 HF 460 Relating to State Fire Code Vetoed - Executive
Veto

About the Selection and Description of Key Votes

Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Vote Smart provides a summary of the version of the bill text associated with each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the project's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. Each key vote selection is reviewed by the project's community of advisors, who are political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top
Back to top