Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Deb Fischer's Ratings and Endorsements

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 100%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 71%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 75%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 75%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 50%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 100%
2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Metals Service Center Institute - Positions 0
2013-2014 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 75%
2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 96%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 100%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Other (Senate Only) 100%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 50%
2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 50
2013-2014 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 100%
2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions (113th Congress, first session) 50
2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 50%
2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 89%
2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75%
2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 75%
2012 Nebraska Chamber of Commerce & Industry - Positions 100%
2012 Nebraska Chamber of Commerce & Industry - Lifetime Score 92%
2011-2012 Nebraska National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 Nebraska Chamber of Commerce & Industry - Positions 100%
2011 Nebraska Chamber of Commerce & Industry - Lifetime Score 91%
2010 Nebraska Chamber of Commerce & Industry - Positions 86%
2009-2010 Nebraska National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%
2007-2008 Nebraska National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2005-2006 Nebraska National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 89%

Immigration

2014 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 100%
2014 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Overall Score (Jan. 7, 2014) 86%
2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions on Immigration Reform 0%
2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 8%
2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions on Economic Empowerment 0%
2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions on Political Appointments 20%
2013-2014 National Iranian American Council - Positions 0%
2013 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Ratings (Congress) 68%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Overall (Feb 11, 2013) 68%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Illegal Jobs and Presence (Feb 11, 2013) 100%
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Jobs and Presence - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Anchor Baby Citizenship - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Immigration at the Border - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Visa Lottery - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Chain Migration - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Overall - Career (Feb 11, 2013) 68%

Socially Conservative

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 64%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (113th Congress) 65%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (113th Congress) 65%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 64%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 70%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 70%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2013-2014 The John Birch Society - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 70%
2013-2014 The John Birch Society - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 70%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 74%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 74%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Liberty Index 83%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Personal Liberties 80%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Liberty Index 83%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 85%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 85%
2013 Republican Liberty Caucus - Personal Liberties 80%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top