Andrew 'Andy' P. Harris
Representative Andrew 'Andy' P. Harris's Special Interest Group Ratings
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts and Entertainment
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
| 2013 | Planned Parenthood - Positions (Feb 26, 2013 | 0% |
| 2012 | Planned Parenthood - Positions | 0% |
| 2011-2012 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 100% |
| 2011 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 0% |
| 2011 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 100% |
| 2010 | Maryland Right to Life - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Maryland Right to Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy | 100% |
| 2008 | Maryland Right to Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy | 100% |
| 2005 | Maryland Right to Life - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | Planned Parenthood of Maryland - Positions | 0% |
| 1999-2003 | Maryland Right to Life - Positions | 100% |
| 1999-2000 | Maryland Right to Life - Positions | 100% |
Animals and Wildlife
| 2011 | The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions | 25% |
| 2010-2011 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 10% |
| 2007-2010 | Maryland Humane Society - Positions | 50% |
| 2007-2010 | Maryland Votes for Animals - Humane Scorecard | 50% |
| 2004 | Maryland Humane Society - Positions | 44% |
| 2003 | Maryland Humane Society - Positions | 100% |
| 2002 | Maryland Humane Society - Positions | 67% |
Arts and Entertainment
| 2012 | TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry | 75% |
| 2011 | Americans for the Arts Action Fund - Positions (House Only) | 0% |
Budget, Spending and Taxes
Business and Consumers
Campaign Finance and Elections
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 100% |
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Education
Environment
Foreign Affairs
Government Operations
Guns
Health and Health Care
Immigration
Labor Unions
Legislative Branch
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 100% |
Liberal
Marriage, Family, and Children
| 2012 | Protect Marriage Maryland - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 2011 | The Children's Health Fund - Positions (House Only) | 0% |
| 2005 | Association of Maryland Families - Positions | 71% |
Military Personnel
| 2011 | Fleet Reserve Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2011 | Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) | 23 |
Social
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
