| Full Name: | Donna Marie Christensen |
|---|---|
| Current Office: | U.S. House - Delegate, Democratic |
| First Elected: | 11/05/1996 |
| Last Elected: | 11/06/2012 |
| Next Election: | 2014 |
Donna Marie Christensen
Representative Donna Marie Christensen's Special Interest Group Ratings
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts and Entertainment
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Animals and Wildlife
| 2009-2010 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
Business and Consumers
| 2008 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
| 2009-2010 | American Civil Liberties Union - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Human Rights Campaign - Positions | 82% |
| 2007-2008 | American Civil Liberties Union - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Human Rights Campaign - Positions | 78% |
| 2005-2006 | Human Rights Campaign - Positions | 0% |
Environment
| 2007-2008 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
Foreign Affairs
| 2009-2010 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions | 50% |
| 2009 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 70% |
| 2006 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 10% |
| 2005-2006 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
Health and Health Care
| 2011 | AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions | 25% |
| 2005-2006 | American Hospital Association - Positions | 14% |
| 2005-2006 | National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions | 25% |
Labor Unions
National Security
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 0% |
Social
| 2010 | Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues | F |
| 2009-2010 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | Population Connection - Committee Votes Score | 100% |
| 2007-2010 | National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
Trade
| 2008 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 1997-1998 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 33% |
Veterans
| 2006 | The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score | 21% |
| 1999 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 0% |
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
