or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Bill Foster

Representative Bill Foster's Special Interest Group Ratings

Bill Foster
Full Name: Bill Foster
Current Office: U.S. House - District 11, Democratic
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012

Business and Consumers

2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 50%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 25%
2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 89%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 26%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 44%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 25%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 55%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 18%
2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 53%
2008 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 28%
2008 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 56%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 56%
2007-2008 American Forest and Paper Association - Forest Products Advocacy Score 100%
2007-2008 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 28%
2007-2008 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 38%
2007-2008 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 75
2007-2008 National Restaurant Association - Positions on Restaurant Advocacy 100
2007-2008 National Retail Federation - Positions Retail Industry Advocacy 40%
2007-2008 National Small Business Association - Positions 63%
2007-2008 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 100%

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 9%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 9%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 48%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 55%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 49%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 49%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 52%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 44%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 2%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 15%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 10%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 4%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 10%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 9%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 27%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 13%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 11%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 51%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 50%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 48%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 36%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 13%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 13%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 42%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 50%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 48%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 44.5%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 35%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 1%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 0
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%

Employment and Affirmative Action

2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%

Labor Unions

2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 93%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 100%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 33%
2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 86%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 92%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 88%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 86%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 89%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 90%
2009 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 92%
2009 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 92%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 80%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 90%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 92%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 92%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 83%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 83%
2008 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 92%
2008 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 66%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2008 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2008 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 70
2007-2008 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 100%
2007-2008 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 25%
2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 68%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top