Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association for the Self-Employed

2003-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 29%
Gary Ackerman 29%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 71%
Rodney Alexander 57%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 29%
Rob Andrews 29%
Joe Baca, Sr. 29%
Spencer Bachus 71%
Brian Baird 29%
Richard Hugh Baker 71%
J. Gresham Barrett 71%
Roscoe Bartlett 86%
Charlie Bass 71%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Beauprez 86%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 43%
Howard Berman 14%
Marion Berry 29%
Judy Biggert 71%
Michael Bilirakis 86%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 29%
Sherwood Boehlert 86%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 71%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 71%
Mary Bono Mack 71%
Leonard Boswell 43%
Rick Boucher 43%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 43%
Henry Brown, Jr. 71%
Ginny Brown-Waite 71%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 57%
Steve Buyer 57%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 71%
Chris Cannon 71%
Eric Cantor 71%
Dennis Cardoza 43%
Julia Carson 14%
Edward Case 71%
Mike Castle 71%
Linc Chafee 100%
Saxby Chambliss 100%
Ben Chandler III 33%
Chris Chocola 71%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Howard Coble 86%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 43%
Christopher Cox 71%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 71%
Barbara Cubin 86%
Randall Cunningham 86%
Artur Davis 57%
James Davis 29%
Jo Ann Davis 86%
Lincoln Davis 71%
Thomas Davis III 86%
Bill Delahunt 29%
Thomas DeLay 71%
James DeMint 57%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 71%
Norm Dicks 29%
John Dingell 29%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 71%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 71%
Chet Edwards 57%
Vern Ehlers 71%
Jo Ann Emerson 71%
Philip English 71%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 29%
Lane Evans 29%
Terry Everett 71%
Tom Feeney 71%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 86%
Bob Filner 29%
Mark Foley 71%
Harold Ford, Jr. 29%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 71%
Barney Frank 29%
William Frist 100%
Elton Gallegly 71%
Jim Gerlach 86%
Jim Gibbons 71%
Wayne Gilchrest 71%
Paul Gillmor 86%
Phil Gingrey 71%
Charlie Gonzalez 57%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 86%
Bart Gordon 14%
Mark Green 86%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 71%
Charles Hagel 100%
Ralph Hall 86%
Tom Harkin 0%
Jane Harman 57%
Katherine Harris 86%
Melissa Hart 71%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 71%
Robert Hayes 86%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 71%
Joel Hefley 71%
Wally Herger, Jr. 71%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 100%
Maurice Hinchey 14%
David Lee Hobson 71%
Pete Hoekstra 86%
Thomas Holden 29%
Rush Holt, Jr. 29%
Darlene Hooley 43%
John Nathan Hostettler 43%
Kenny Hulshof 71%
Duncan Hunter 86%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Henry Hyde 57%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 67%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 29%
William Jefferson 43%
James Merrill Jeffords 100%
William Lewis Jenkins 57%
Nancy Johnson 57%
Tim Johnson 86%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 29%
Ric Keller 71%
Sue Kelly 86%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 86%
Patrick Kennedy 29%
Dale Kildee 29%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 29%
Jack Kingston 71%
Joseph Knollenberg 71%
Herb Kohl 0%
James Kolbe 71%
Dennis Kucinich 29%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 71%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Lantos 29%
Tom Latham 71%
Steve LaTourette 86%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
James Leach 86%
Carl Levin 0%
Jerry Lewis 71%
Ron Lewis 71%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 71%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 100%
Don Manzullo 86%
Jim Marshall 57%
Jim Matheson 71%
Robert Matsui 29%
Carolyn McCarthy 29%
Thaddeus McCotter 86%
James McCrery III 71%
John McHugh 86%
Mike McIntyre 57%
Buck McKeon 86%
Michael McNulty 29%
Martin Meehan 29%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 43%
Mike Michaud 29%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 29%
Gary Miller 71%
George Miller 29%
Brad Miller 29%
Alan Mollohan 29%
Dennis Moore 29%
Jim Moran, Jr. 43%
Jack Murtha 29%
Marilyn Musgrave 57%
Sue Myrick 71%
Ben Nelson 100%
Robert William Ney 86%
Anne Northup 71%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top