Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado PTA

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Alice Borodkin 100%
Betty Boyd 100%
Michael Cerbo 100%
Fran Coleman 100%
Joan Fitz-Gerald 100%
K. Jerry Frangas 100%
Peter Groff 100%
Deanna Hanna 100%
CO State Senate 25 Mary Hodge Democratic 100%
James Isgar 100%
Joel Judd 100%
Alice Madden 100%
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen Democratic 100%
Anne McGihon 100%
Tom Plant 100%
Stephanie Takis 100%
Ron Tupa 100%
Valentin Vigil 100%
Paul Weissmann 100%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 80%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 80%
Maryanne Keller 80%
Mark Larson 80%
Rosemary Marshall 80%
Michael Merrifield 80%
Angie Paccione 80%
John Pommer 80%
Ann Ragsdale 80%
Abel Tapia 80%
Jennifer Veiga 80%
Suzanne Williams 80%
Sue Windels 80%
Dorothy Butcher 75%
Terrance Carroll 60%
Mark Alan Cloer 60%
Michael Garcia 60%
Andrew Romanoff 60%
CO Council Member 1 Susan Shepherd 60%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 60%
CO State Senate 24 Lois Tochtrop Democratic 60%
Richard Decker 40%
Lewis Entz 40%
Daniel Grossman 40%
Norma Anderson 20%
F. Jim Dyer 20%
Bob Hagedorn 20%
Diane Hoppe 20%
CO State Senate 1 Greg Brophy Republican 0%
CO State Senate 12 Bill Cadman Republican 0%
Lauri Clapp 0%
Bill Crane 0%
John Evans 0%
Dale Hall 0%
CO State Senate 30 Ted Harvey Republican 0%
Lynn Christian Hefley 0%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 0%
Ed Jones 0%
Kenneth Kester 0%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 0%
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 0%
CO State Senate 15 Kevin Lundberg Republican 0%
Michael May 0%
Ronny May 0%
Bob McCluskey, Jr. 0%
Andrew McElhany 0%
Shawn Mitchell 0%
David Owen 0%
Raymond Rose 0%
David Schultheis 0%
Nancy Spence 0%
Debbie Stafford 0%
Jack Taylor 0%
Ronald Teck 0%
James Welker 0%
Albert White 0%
Tom Wiens 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top