Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Service Employees International Union (SEIU)

2009-2010 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
John Adler 73%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 96%
Todd Akin 3%
Rodney Alexander 3%
Jason Altmire 63%
Rob Andrews 100%
Michael Arcuri 68%
Steve Austria 6%
Joe Baca, Sr. 96%
Michele Bachmann 0%
Spencer Bachus 0%
Brian Baird 75%
J. Gresham Barrett 0%
John Barrow 56%
Roscoe Bartlett 3%
Max Baucus 78%
Evan Bayh 71%
Melissa Bean 79%
Mark Begich 90%
Bob Bennett 6%
Shelley Berkley 96%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 60%
Judy Biggert 13%
Brian Bilbray 3%
Jeff Bingaman 92%
Tim Bishop 96%
John Boccieri 80%
Kit Bond 6%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 0%
Mary Bono Mack 10%
Dan Boren 28%
Leonard Boswell 96%
Rick Boucher 60%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 79%
Bruce Braley 100%
Bobby Bright 16%
Paul Broun 0%
Henry Brown, Jr. 7%
Scott Brown 17%
Ginny Brown-Waite 7%
Jim Bunning 8%
Roland Burris 100%
Dan Burton 3%
Steve Buyer 3%
Robert Byrd 80%
Dave Camp 3%
John Campbell III 6%
Eric Cantor 0%
Joseph Cao 41%
Dennis Cardoza 93%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Christopher Carney 76%
Mike Castle 33%
Saxby Chambliss 2%
Ben Chandler III 63%
Travis Childers 34%
Howard Coble 0%
Thomas Coburn 7%
Kent Conrad 90%
Jerry Costello 83%
Mark Critz 50%
Kathy Dahlkemper 70%
Artur Davis 57%
Geoff Davis 0%
Lincoln Davis 46%
Bill Delahunt 100%
James DeMint 6%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 20%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Charles Djou 30%
Chris Dodd 92%
Byron Dorgan 92%
David Dreier 3%
Steve Driehaus 83%
Chet Edwards 63%
Vern Ehlers 13%
Brad Ellsworth 76%
Jo Ann Emerson 10%
John Ensign 12%
Bob Etheridge 90%
Russ Feingold 88%
Bob Filner 100%
Barney Frank 100%
Elton Gallegly 3%
Jim Gerlach 10%
Gabrielle Giffords 86%
Phil Gingrey 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Carte Goodwin 100%
Bart Gordon 86%
Judd Gregg 6%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 14%
Kay Hagan 82%
John Hall 93%
Ralph Hall 3%
Debbie Halvorson 86%
Phil Hare 100%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 96%
Doc Hastings 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 55%
Baron Hill 73%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
Paul Hodes 90%
Pete Hoekstra 3%
Thomas Holden 63%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Kay Hutchison 10%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 3%
Daniel Inouye 94%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
Mike Johanns 3%
Timothy Johnson 86%
Tim Johnson 10%
Steve Kagen 96%
Paul Kanjorski 80%
Ted Kaufman 93%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 96%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 96%
Mary Jo Kilroy 100%
Jack Kingston 3%
Paul Kirk, Jr. 100%
Larry Kissell 70%
Ron Klein 86%
Herb Kohl 88%
Suzanne Kosmas 83%
Frank Kratovil, Jr. 50%
Dennis Kucinich 90%
Jon Kyl 3%
Mary Landrieu 80%
Tom Latham 3%
Steve LaTourette 6%
Frank Lautenberg 98%
Chris Lee 6%
George LeMieux 2%
Carl Levin 96%
Jerry Lewis 3%
Joe Lieberman 75%
Blanche Lincoln 65%
John Linder 0%
Dick Lugar 12%
Dan Lungren 3%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Dan Maffei 86%
Don Manzullo 0%
Betsy Markey 70%
Jim Marshall 41%
Melquiades Martinez 25%
Eric Massa 73%
Jim Matheson 53%
Carolyn McCarthy 93%
Thaddeus McCotter 10%
John McHugh 37%
Mike McIntyre 36%
Buck McKeon 3%
Michael McMahon 70%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 96%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 66%
Mike Michaud 93%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Brad Miller 100%
Walt Minnick 50%
Harry Mitchell 66%
Alan Mollohan 96%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 92%
Patrick Murphy 86%
Scott Murphy 76%
Jack Murtha 92%
Sue Myrick 0%
Ben Nelson 37%
Glenn Nye III 60%
Jim Oberstar 96%
Dave Obey 96%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 86%
Bill Owens 85%
Ed Pastor 100%
Ron Paul 16%
Donald Payne 96%
Tom Perriello 78%
Tom Petri 10%
Todd Platts 13%
Earl Pomeroy 90%
Mark Pryor 72%
George Radanovich 4%
Nick Rahall II 86%
Denny Rehberg 6%
Silvestre Reyes 96%
Laura Richardson 96%
Jay Rockefeller IV 95%
Ciro Rodriguez 96%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top