Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Eleanor Norton's Ratings and Endorsements

Arts, Entertainment, and History

2013-2014 Americans for the Arts Action Fund - Positions 100%

Foreign Affairs

2015-2016 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 43%
2013-2014 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 80%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 9%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 46%
2011-2012 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 70%
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 50%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions 60%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 70%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues B
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +5
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 70%
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0
2005-2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 88%

Immigration

2015-2016 NumbersUSA - Positions [12/2] 8%
2015 National Iranian American Council - Positions 75%
2015 NumbersUSA - Positions 1%
2014 NumbersUSA - Overall Score (Jan. 7, 2014) 21%
2013-2014 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 43%
2013-2014 National Iranian American Council - Positions 75%
2013 NumbersUSA - Positions 0%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 9%
2011-2012 NumbersUSA - Positions 35%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Reduce Visa Lottery (Feb 11, 2013) 100%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards (Feb 11, 2013) 0%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Reduce Amnesty Enticements (Feb 11, 2013) 0%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Reduce Illegal Immigration at the Border (Feb 11, 2013) 0%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Reduce Unnecessary Foreign Workers (Feb 11, 2013) 0%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Reduce Illegal Jobs and Presence (Feb 11, 2013) 0%
2009-2013 NumbersUSA - Positions - Overall (Feb 11, 2013) 16%
2009-2010 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 5%
2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 89%
2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 53%
2005-2008 NumbersUSA - Lifetime Score 7%
2005-2006 NumbersUSA - Positions 0%
2004 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 50%
2003-2006 NumbersUSA - Positions 0%
1989-2016 NumbersUSA - Lifetime Scores [12/2] 13%
1989-2015 NumbersUSA - Lifetime Scores 13%
1989-2013 NumbersUSA - Overall - Career (Feb 11, 2013) 13%

Unemployed and Low-Income

2012 RESULTS - Positions 24%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top