Card image cap

Mike Rogers' Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Arts, Entertainment, and History

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House (AL) - District 3

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

75%
2013
75%
2013
68%
2013
68%
2013
87%
2013
87%
2013
26%
2013
26%
2013
42%
2013
42%
2013
58%
2013
58%
2013
0%
2013
27%
2012
27%
2012
38%
2012
38%
2012
72%
2012
72%
2012
68%
2012
68%
2012
60%
2012
60%
2012
68%
2012
68%
2012
30%
2012
30%
2012
33%
2012
33%
2012
61%
2011
61%
2011
63%
2011
63%
2011
73%
2011
73%
2011
37%
2011
37%
2011
39%
2011
39%
2011
43%
2011
43%
2011
54%
2011
54%
2011
27%
2011
27%
2011
21%
2010
21%
2010
23%
2010
23%
2010
79%
2010
79%
2010
77%
2010
77%
2010
79%
2010
79%
2010
12%
2010
12%
2010
22%
2010
22%
2010
77%
2010
77%
2010
66%
2009
66%
2009
73%
2009
73%
2009
63%
2009
63%
2009
33%
2009
33%
2009
34%
2009
34%
2009
69%
2009
69%
2009
32%
2009
32%
2009
24%
2009
24%
2009
74%
2008
74%
2008
67.5%
2008
67.5%
2008
33%
2008
33%
2008
40%
2008
40%
2008
20%
2008
20%
2008
60%
2008
60%
2008
34%
2008
34%
2008
65%
2008
65%
2008
72%
2007
72%
2007
85%
2007
85%
2007
19%
2007
19%
2007
81%
2007
81%
2007
9%
2007
69%
2007
69%
2007
0%
2007
31%
2007
31%
2007
67%
2006
67%
2006
70.8%
2006
70.8%
2006
32%
2006
32%
2006
29.2%
2006
29.2%
2006
38%
2006
38%
2006
84%
2006
84%
2006
59%
2006
59%
2006
15%
2006
15%
2006
59%
2005
59%
2005
41%
2005
41%
2005
29%
2005
29%
2005
31%
2005
31%
2005
77%
2005
77%
2005
22%
2005
22%
2005
70%
2005
70%
2005
69%
2005
69%
2005
25%
2004
25%
2004
26%
2004
26%
2004
73%
2004
73%
2004
17%
2004
17%
2004
78%
2004
78%
2004
74%
2004
74%
2004
83%
2003
83%
2003
79%
2003
79%
2003
0%
2003
17%
2003
17%
2003
89%
2003
89%
2003
73%
2003
73%
2003
17%
2003
17%
2003
26%
2003
26%
2003
33%
2003
25%
2017-2018
arrow_upward