Representative Eric I. Cantor's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Eric I. Cantor
Current Office: U.S. House - District 7, Republican
First Elected: 11/07/2000
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Diana; 3 Children: Evan, Jenna, Michael
Birth Date: 06/06/1963
Birth Place: Richmond, VA
Home City: Richmond, VA
Religion: Jewish
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Foreign Affairs

2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 27% 2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 27% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 73% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 100% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0% 2011 Peace Action West - Positions 10% 2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100% 2010 Peace Action - Positions 13% 2010 Peace Action West - Positions 13% 2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0% 2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 0% 2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10% 2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100% 2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27% 2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0% 2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0% 2009 Peace Action West - Positions 9% 2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0% 2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2008 Peace Action West - Positions 0% 2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100% 2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0% 2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 7% 2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10% 2007 Peace Action West - Positions 11% 2006 Church World Service - Positions 33 2006 Peace Action - Positions 7% 2006 Peace Action West - Positions 7% 2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 94% 2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 6% 2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 8% 2005 Church World Service - Positions 0 2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D 2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0% 2005 Peace Action - Positions 8% 2005 PeacePAC - Positions 15% 2004 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 69% 2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0% 2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0% 2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33% 2004 Peace Action - Positions 0% 2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7% 2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 9% 2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 11% 2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0% 2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0% 2003 Peace Action - Positions 0% 2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3 2002 Peace Action - Positions 0% 2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 88% 2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -14 2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0% 2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0% 2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 14% 2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.