Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Tracey J. Eide's Ratings and Endorsements

Business and Consumers

2014 Associated General Contractors of Washington - Positions 61%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Positions 50%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 88%
2014 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 43%
2013-2014 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 30%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Positions 59%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 42%
2013 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 85%
2012 Association of Washington Business - Positions 60%
2011-2012 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 20%
2011 Association of Washington Business - Positions 57%
2010 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 39%
2010 Association of Washington Business - Positions 38%
2009-2010 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 20%
2009 Association of Washington Business - Positions 46%
2008 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 23
2007-2008 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 38
2007 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 32
2007 Building Industry Association of Washington - Housing Industry Advocacy Score 27
2006 Association of Washington Business - Positions 71%
2005-2006 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2005 Association of Washington Business - Positions 21%
2005 Building Industry Association of Washington - Positions 0%
2004 Association of Washington Business - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 46%
2003 Association of Washington Business - Positions 44%
2002 Association of Washington Business - Positions 40%
2001-2002 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 33%
2001 Association of Washington Business - State Senate Score 42%
1999-2000 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%

Labor Unions

2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 85%
2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 88%
2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 85%
2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 67%
2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 86%
2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Postions 38%
2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 85%
2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 88%
2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 90%
2009 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 50%
2008 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2007 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2006 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 100%
2006 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2005 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 100%
2005 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 93%
2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 91%
2003-2004 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 80%
2003 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 70%
2003 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 87%
2002 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 90%
2001 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top