Tax Reconciliatiion

Date: May 17, 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Issues: Taxes


TAX RECONCILIATION

At the request of Mr. REID, the following statement was ordered to be printed in the RECORD.) -- (Senate - May 17, 2006)

TAX RECONCILIATION

* [Begin Insert]

Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, I regret that rehabilitation following back surgery prevented me from being on the floor to cast my vote against the tax reconciliation package which the Senate narrowly approved on May 11. Today President Bush will sign that bill into law, and I would like to take this opportunity to share my thoughts with my constituents and my colleagues. I am extremely disturbed by the Nation's fiscal mismanagement over the past several years, and this new tax cut bill was another disappointing step in the wrong direction.

On February 2, I voted for the Senate's version of the tax reconciliation bill. That legislation protected middle-class taxpayers from the alternative minimum tax and extended some widely supported tax provisions that recently expired. The Senate bill also included urgently needed incentives for investment in mine safety equipment and technology. I was pleased to support that bill.

Unfortunately, as I feared, during negotiations with the House, the reasonable compromise struck in the Senate was abandoned. The final tax package that the conference committee produced has the wrong priorities and will make America's fiscal situation substantially worse.

Middle-class relief from the alternative minimum tax expired at the end of last year. The conference report extends AMT relief through 2006 but does nothing about next year when millions of families will face an enormous tax increase. Additionally, the bill does not include the tax provisions, which I have long supported, that help average West Virginians. Tax cuts which benefit families paying college tuition, schoolteachers buying supplies, and businesses investing in research and development were simply not included in this bill. These provisions have already expired, meaning taxpayers will be hit with higher taxes this year. I recognize that the Senate majority leader has indicated his intention to address these issues later this year, and I will continue to advocate for extension of these important provisions. However, I believe it is irresponsible not to make tax cuts for middle-class families our top priority.

Instead of addressing these urgent priorities, the bill acts to extend tax cuts for investors that were not even set to expire until 2009. I cannot understand why tax cuts that primarily benefit taxpayers with more than $200,000 in income would get a higher priority than tax relief for middle-class families. Unfortunately, in West Virginia, very few taxpayers have been able to benefit from the investor tax cuts enacted in 2003. Fewer than 17 percent of taxpayers reported any dividend income, and fewer than 11 percent of our taxpayers had any capital gains subject to tax.

I am also extremely disturbed by the budget gimmicks used in order to comply with the Senate's rules designed to impose fiscal discipline. By taking advantage of unusual revenue effects, this bill amazingly pays for tax cuts with yet more tax cuts. But without question, we are digging ourselves deeper in debt with such games. In the long run, this bill will cost us even more than the $70 billion its sponsors claim. And because so many important issues have been left unaddressed, Congress will need to enact additional tax cuts this year. This fiscal mismanagement increases our borrowing from foreign nations and increases the burden on our future generations.

Finally, I would like to mention the 18 miners in West Virginia, as well as those in other States, who lost their lives this year and their devastated families, friends, and communities. I am deeply disappointed that this agreement does not include the bipartisan mine safety amendment, which I worked so hard to include in the Senate bill. That amendment would have encouraged mine companies to invest in additional mine safety equipment and training and, most importantly, would have saved lives. This is a provision which cannot wait, and I will continue to push to have this provision enacted. The well-being and safety of miners demands it.

http://thomas.loc.gov/

arrow_upward