Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
John Breaux 100%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Jim Bunning 50%
Conrad Burns 50%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 100%
Ben Campbell 50%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Brad Carson 0%
Julia Carson 0%
Mike Castle 100%
Lincoln Chafee 100%
Saxby Chambliss 100%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 100%
Michael Collins 100%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 0%
Christopher Cox 100%
Larry Craig 50%
Robert Cramer 100%
Philip Crane 100%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 0%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 100%
Bill Delahunt 0%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 100%
Peter Deutsch 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 100%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Dingell 0%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 50%
Calvin Dooley 0%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 100%
Jennifer Dunn 100%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 0%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 100%
Philip English 100%
John Ensign 50%
Bob Etheridge 0%
Lane Evans 0%
Terry Everett 100%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 0%
Peter Fitzgerald 100%
Mark Foley 100%
Harold Ford, Jr. 0%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 100%
Barney Frank 0%
William Frist 50%
Jonas Frost III 0%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 0%
Jim Gibbons 100%
Wayne Gilchrest 100%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 0%
Porter Goss 100%
Daniel Graham 100%
Mark Green 100%
James Greenwood 100%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Charles Hagel 50%
Ralph Hall 0%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 0%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Baron Hill 0%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 100%
Joseph Hoeffel 0%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 0%
Ernest Hollings 100%
Rush Holt, Jr. 0%
Darlene Hooley 0%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 100%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Kay Hutchison 50%
Henry Hyde 100%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
William Jefferson 0%
James Merrill Jeffords 50%
William Lewis Jenkins 100%
Christopher John 0%
Nancy Johnson 100%
Tim Johnson 100%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 0%
Ric Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 100%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 0%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 0%
Jack Kingston 100%
Gerald Kleczka 0%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 100%
Dennis Kucinich 0%
Jon Kyl 50%
Ray LaHood 100%
Nicholas Lampson 0%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Lantos 0%
Tom Latham 100%
Steve LaTourette 100%
James Leach 100%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 100%
William Lipinski 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 50%
Ken Lucas 100%
Dick Lugar 50%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Matheson 0%
Robert Matsui 0%
Carolyn McCarthy 0%
Karen McCarthy 0%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 100%
Mike McIntyre 0%
Buck McKeon 100%
Michael McNulty 0%
Martin Meehan 0%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 0%
Gary Miller 100%
George Miller 0%
Zell Bryan Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 0%
Dennis Moore 0%
Jim Moran, Jr. 0%
Jack Murtha 0%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 100%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 100%
Robert William Ney 100%
Don Nickles 50%
Anne Northup 100%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 100%
James Nussle 100%
Jim Oberstar 0%
Dave Obey 0%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 0%
Thomas William Osborne 100%
Doug Ose 100%
Major Owens 0%
Michael Oxley 100%
Ed Pastor 0%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 0%
John Peterson 100%
Tom Petri 100%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 100%
Todd Platts 100%
Richard Pombo 100%
Earl Pomeroy 0%
Deborah Pryce 100%
Jack Quinn 100%
George Radanovich 100%
Nick Rahall II 0%
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 100%
Denny Rehberg 100%
Silvestre Reyes 0%
Thomas Reynolds 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top