On The Ballot: Running, Green Party for President
Jill Stein is currently being tested through the 2024 Political Courage Test.
For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2024.
Pro-choice | Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation? | ||
I believe that women have a right to make their own reproductive health decisions free of coercion from legislatures, the courts, or their employers. I would reduce unwanted pregnancies by implementing a universal single-payer health care system that would provide all women with the reproductive health care they need and deserve. |
Yes | In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending? | ||
Yes | In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket? | ||
We are now spending more on the military than the next seven nations in the world - and most of those seven nations are our allies. We cannot afford to continue this overspending. Nor can we afford the unnecessary and unjust tax breaks which allow corporations and the wealthy to shift their taxes onto the backs of ordinary people. |
Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions? | ||
Our democracy must be protected from the disempowerment of voters that occurs when big money controls elections. An electoral system controlled by private money will never produce a government that stands up for ordinary people. I do not accept the support of superPACs nor do I accept campaign donations from lobbyists hired by for-profit corporations to seek influence with my administration. I support public campaign financing which is a proven technique for allowing good candidates to run for office without selling out to wealthy special interests. |
No | Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes? | ||
Yes | Do you support alternatives to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders such as mandatory counseling or substance abuse treatment? | ||
No | Do you support mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders? | ||
Experience indicates that capital punishment does not serve the interests of justice or deterrence. It provides a distraction from the question of how to prevent future criminal acts. Our goal in sentencing non-violent offenders should be to return them to their families and communities and help them live socially constructive lives. Mandatory minimum sentences often result in unjust sentencing and should be eliminated. |
Yes | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
No | Do you support lowering taxes as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
Yes | Do you support providing tax incentives to businesses for the purpose of job creation? | ||
Federal spending on needed infrastructure or on developing beneficial markets is an investment that pays for itself many times over. I do not support broad no-strings-attached tax reductions awarded with the vague and suspect argument that they promote "growth". Such tax breaks tend to shift taxes from corporations to individual taxpayers, and they are very expensive for the benefits they produce. Tax breaks and tax incentives should be designed to produce specific social benefits and should not be designed so that only the wealthy can take advantage of them. |
No | Do you generally support requiring states to adopt federal education standards? | ||
The Federal government must stop pushing questionable "reforms" such as privatization, charter schools, and standardized testing. The Federal government should not punish struggling schools by denying them the funds that they desperately need to provide services to students. Competition for funding should not be used to bully schools or to camouflage the lack of adequate overall funding. I do support federal involvement that encourages state action to eliminate racial disparities in education and to learn from the experiences of other states. |
No | Do you support building the Keystone XL pipeline? | ||
Yes | Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)? | ||
Yes | Do you support increased regulations on the hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") industry? | ||
We should be investing our nation's wealth in renewable energy, not in fossil fuel infrastructure that locks us in to further damage from climate change. I would ban fracking as part of an initiative to end fossil fuel pollution and stop funding of dirty energy markets. The health care savings that can be realized by cleaning up our air and water with renewable energy will largely pay for renewable energy infrastructure. |
Yes | Do you believe that human activity is contributing to climate change? | ||
Yes | Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions? | ||
Climate change is the greatest challenge that humanity has ever faced. If we continue down the road of inadequate, "all of the above" energy programs, we will see our economy destroyed and our children facing a destabilized and inhospitable planet. The United States must show leadership in supporting a binding international agreement that does what science says is necessary to save our planet. We must begin an emergency initiative to transition to renewable energy by 2030. |
Yes | Do you generally support gun-control legislation? | ||
I support measures such as background checks for gun purchases and a ban on military-style assault rifles. My universal health care program will help reduce gun violence by ensuring that emotionally disturbed individuals get proper mental health care before they get to the point of committing violent acts. |
No | Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")? | ||
Rather than a simple "repeal" I favor replacing the floundering Obamacare system with a universal "Medicare for All" system in which every citizen would receive adequate health care by presenting a single card to medical care providers. This would save billions of dollars that are now wasted in paperwork, and it would allow us to stop the overcharging for prescription drugs. |
No | Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship? | ||
I favor a welcoming path to citizenship for all law-abiding immigrants. I will end the massive deportations that have been occurring in recent years. I strongly oppose any new mass deportation scheme. |
Yes | Do you support same-sex marriage? | ||
In 2002 I became the first gubernatorial candidate in my state to support marriage equality (at a time when no other major party candidate had ever gone further than supporting "civil unions"). In 2012 I made marriage equality a key point of my presidential campaign at a time when "gay marriage" was opposed by my opponents. I am proud of my party's consistent support for fair and equal treatment of all persons regardless of their sexual orientation. |
No | Do you support increased American intervention in Iraq and Syria beyond air support? | ||
No | Should the U.S use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the United States from possessing a nuclear weapon? | ||
We have no right to seize the land or the skies of Syria. "No fly" zones are shoot-down zones likely to lead to war with Russia. We must work with all parties to create a cease fire and a negotiated solution. We must establish a weapons embargo and freeze the bank accounts of countries refusing to stop funding terrorist groups - including the Saudis. We should support the elimination of all nuclear weapons. Using military attacks to manage a one-sided nuclear arms race is dangerous and sure to fail. |
No | Do you support allowing individuals to divert a portion of their Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts? | ||
Social Security should be a cornerstone of retirement security for all Americans. It should not be undermined by diverting its revenues into private accounts. |
SpendingIndicate what federal spending levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.TaxesIndicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.
Slightly Decrease | a) Agriculture | ||
Slightly Increase | b) Arts | ||
Greatly Decrease | c) Defense | ||
Greatly Increase | d) Education | ||
Greatly Increase | e) Environment | ||
Slightly Decrease | f) Homeland Security | ||
Maintain Status | g) International aid | ||
Maintain Status | h) Medical Research | ||
Maintain Status | i) Scientific Research | ||
Slightly Decrease | j) Space exploration | ||
Maintain Status | k) United Nations | ||
Slightly Increase | l) Welfare | ||
m) Other or expanded categories | |||
Greatly Increase | a) Capital gains taxes | ||
Greatly Increase | b) Corporate taxes | ||
Maintain Status | c) Small business taxes | ||
Maintain Status | d) Excise taxes (alcohol) | ||
Maintain Status | e) Excise taxes (cigarettes) | ||
Slightly Increase | f) Excise taxes (transportation fuel) | ||
Slightly Decrease | g) Income taxes (low-income families) | ||
Slightly Decrease | h) Income taxes (middle-income families) | ||
Slightly Increase | i) Income taxes (high-income families) | ||
Greatly Increase | j) Inheritance taxes | ||
Maintain Status | k) Payroll taxes | ||
We must enact a financial transaction tax to apply to stock market exchanges. |
I would use executive orders to implement policies that have the support of the American people, and are consistent with the Constitution, but which are being blocked by a Congress under the influence of big money lobbyists. |
First, create full employment through direct job creation wherever unemployment exists. Secondly, ensure universal access to health care, containing health care costs through a Medicare-for-All insurance system. Thirdly, pursue a binding international agreement to do what science says is necessary to avert a climate catastrophe. Initial costs for these programs would be covered by cutting unnecessary military spending and requiring wealthier Americans to pay their fair share of taxes. Ultimately, all expenses are more than paid for by health care savings and avoiding costly environmental disasters. |
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.