or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Edward 'Ted' E. Kaufman

Edward 'Ted' E. Kaufman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: Edward 'Ted' E. Kaufman

Conservative

2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 5%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 4%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 6%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 6%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 4%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 14%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 20%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 10%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 10%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 20%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 4%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 4%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 4%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 15%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 9%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 9%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 23%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 20%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 23%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 16%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 6%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 50%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 50%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 3%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 14%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top