Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Party first, country second? Who are these people?
Project Vote Smart: where conservatives and liberals join together to defend our right to the truth.
Print

Summary

Representative Michael 'Mike' E. Capuano

Biographical

Current Office: U.S. House (MA) - District 8, Democratic
First Elected: 11/03/1998
Last Elected: 11/02/2010
Next Election: 2012
On The Ballot: None, Democratic for U.S. House - District 7
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Barbara; 2 Children: Michael, Joseph
Birth Date: 01/09/1952
Birth Place: Somerville, MA
Home City: Somerville, MA
Religion: Catholic

Issue Category:

Recent Key Votes

HR 4310 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
Legislation (Nay)

May 18, 2012

H Amdt 1140 - Prohibits Reductions to Strategic Nuclear Arms Required by New START
Amendment (Nay)

May 18, 2012

H Amdt 1127 - Repeals Indefinite Military Detention Provisions
Amendment (Yea)

May 18, 2012

More Key Votes

Recent Public Statements

This week the House considered H.R. 4970: the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA) of 2012. This law first passed in 1994 and has been reauthorized twice. In fact, when it was reauthorized in 2005, the bill passed the House with a 415-4 vote. Last month the Senate passed its reauthorization bill with a bipartisan vote of 68 to 31. Instead of taking up the Senate's version, the House instead took up its own measure, one that the President has already said he will veto. Among other provisions, the 1994 VAWA allowed immigrants who were being abused to petition for their own independent legal status. This part of the law protected individuals who were living in the country legally as the spouse of a citizen or a lawful permanent resident. It gave them the ability to report the abuse and remove themselves from a dangerous environment without fear of deportation. H.R. 4970 weakens that provision in an important way. It eliminates a requirement that abuser-provided testimony or evidence be corroborated before denying a petition for independent legal status. What does this mean? Currently, abusers who deny that they are inflicting harm must submit some evidence that they are actually telling the truth -- testimony from a family member, counselor or law enforcement personnel, something besides their own statement. H.R. 4970 rolls back that provision. Instead of requiring some supporting evidence, this bill simply requires that the word of the alleged abuser be weighed against the word of the abused. Just on the basis of that, a petition for independent legal status can be denied. I want to be very clear; this has nothing to do with illegal immigration. Anyone covered by this provision is already here legally. There is no credible reason to weaken a part of the law that has been in place since 1994. H.R. 4970 does not include provisions that would protect Native Americans who are being abused. Currently more than 50% of all Native American women are either married to or living with someone who is not a Native American. However, tribal courts do not have the authority to pursue charges against non-Native Americans. Instead, someone who is abused is forced to seek help through federal or state law enforcement. That help is all too often located hours away, creating a barrier when it comes to reporting abuse. The Senate bill would simply have given tribal courts the ability to prosecute non-Native Americans who are accused of domestic violence against Native Americans. H.R. 4970 also fails to adequately protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (LGBT) victims. It does not include Senate-passed provisions that would prohibit VAWA-funded programs from discriminating based on sexual orientation. And it doesn't add LGBT victims to the STOP Grant program, which funds domestic violence support initiatives. Studies have shown that members of the LGBT community do face discrimination when seeking services, including being turned away from domestic violence shelters. These provisions are simply about equality. Sexual orientation shouldn't matter. Abuse is abuse and help should be there for everyone who needs it. Over 100 organizations oppose the House version, including the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, the National Women's Law Center, the American Bar Association, the NAACP, the Human Rights Campaign and the National Congress of American Indians. I voted NO. H.R. 4970 passed and the entire vote is recorded below: YEA NAY PRESENT NOT VOTING REPUBLICAN 216 23 0 2 DEMOCRAT 6 182 0 2 TOTAL 222 205 0 4 MASSACHUSETTS DELEGATION 0 10 0 0

May 18, 2012 - This week the House considered H.R. 4970: the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA) of 2012. This law first passed in 1994 and has been ...

Expressing Sense of House Regarding Importance of Preventing Iran from Acquiring a Nuclear Weapons Capability

May 17, 2012 - Mr. CAPUANO. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to discuss my vote in favor of H. Res. 568. I would like to clarify that nothing in ...

Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act; Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Aencies Appropriations Act; Sudan

May 11, 2012 - Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Yesterday the House considered H.R. 5652: the Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act of 2012. Last summer, Congress passed the Budget Control Act, which ...

More Public Statements

Recent Interest Group Ratings

Span Name Rating
2002-2006 Voices for Creative Nonviolence Iraq War Resolution and Funding 40%
2005 National Journal Composite Liberal Score 88%
2006 National Journal Composite Liberal Score 85.5%
More Ratings

Campaign Finances

Election Cycle 2012
Total Income $555,590.27
Total Spent $295,340.96
Cash On Hand $428,676.88
Debt $0.00
Source OpenSecrets.org
Updated 03/31/2012
More Campaign Finance Data

Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Mike Capuano has 100% Political Courage

Project Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity including advertising, debates, and speeches.

View Michael 'Mike' E. Capuano's Massachusetts Congressional Election 2010 Political Courage Test

Contact Information

Washington, D.C. Email
committee@mikecapuano.com

Washington, D.C. Webmail
http://www.house.gov/capuano/contact/email.shtml

Washington, D.C. Website
http://www.house.gov/capuano/

Capitol Website - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/user/RepMikeCapuano

Capitol Website - Twitter
http://twitter.com/#!/Mikecapuano

Capitol Website - Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/RepMichaelCapuano

Washington, D.C.
1414 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-5111
Fax: 202-225-9322

District
Roxbury Community College
Campus Library
Room 211
Roxbury, MA 02120
Phone: 617-621-6208
Fax: 617-621-8628

District
110 First Street
Cambridge, MA 02141
Phone: 617-621-6208
Fax: 617-621-8628

Key Staff
1530 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-5111
Fax: 202-225-9322

Key Staff
1530 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-5111
Fax: 202-225-9322

Key Staff
1530 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-5111
Fax: 202-225-9322

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 2002 - 2012 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc.

Back to top