Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Wyoming AFL-CIO

2003 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
Deborah Alden 80%
James Anderson 80%
Rodney Anderson 90%
George Bagby 90%
WY U.S. Senate Jr John Barrasso Republican 80%
Rosie Berger 80%
Tex Boggs 100%
Bob Brechtel 60%
Ed Buchanan 90%
Kurt Bucholz 80%
WY State Senate 21 Bruce Burns Republican 90%
WY State Senate 25 Cale Case Republican 40%
Charles Childers 89%
WY State Senate 18 Henry Coe Republican 80%
Roy Cohee 80%
Ken Decaria 90%
Ross Diercks 80%
David Edwards 90%
Floyd Esquibel 90%
Gerald Geis 30%
Mary Meyer Gilmore 90%
James Hageman 90%
John Hanes 80%
WY State House 37 Steve Harshman Republican 89%
Elaine Harvey 90%
Bill Hawks 70%
Becket Hinckley 90%
John Hines 70%
Jerry Iekel 78%
Pete Illoway 90%
Rae Lynn Job 100%
Alan Jones 60%
Peter Jorgensen 90%
Jack Landon, Jr. 80%
Grant Larson 60%
Frank Latta 60%
Tom Lockhart 80%
Randall Luthi 90%
Marty Martin 100%
Mike Massie 80%
Del McOmie 70%
WY State Senate 3 Curt Meier Republican 78%
R. Larry Meuli 90%
WY State House 55 David Miller Republican 80%
E. Jayne Mockler 70%
Layton Morgan 90%
Monte Olsen 70%
Douglas Osborn 70%
Robert Peck 80%
Owen Petersen 80%
Frank Philp 67%
Mick Powers 80%
Paul Wayne Reese 70%
Ann Robinson 100%
John Schiffer 70%
WY State Senate 30 Charles Scott Republican 80%
Mark Semlek 70%
WY State Board of Education Kathryn Sessions Democratic 90%
Colin Simpson 90%
James Slater 90%
Bill Thompson 90%
Bill Vasey 90%
Tom Walsh 90%
Jane Warren 90%
WY State Senate 23 Jeff Wasserburger Republican 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top