| Office: | State House (WA) - 11 Position 1, Democratic |
|---|
Please help us! Donate
Vote Smart Just The Facts
"Experts nearly all recommend Vote Smart."
"Vote Smart is a bright light in an often desultory civic culture."
- Bill Moyers
"We think so highly of Vote Smart that we are distributing their materials to all of our affiliates."
Zack Hudgins's Ratings and Endorsements
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
Agriculture and Food
| 2014 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 38% |
| 2013 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 42% |
| 2012 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 13% |
| 2011 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 80% |
| 2010 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 64% |
| 2009 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 40% |
| 2008 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions on Agriculture | 40 |
| 2007 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 40% |
| 2005-2006 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 60% |
| 2005 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 44% |
| 2003 | Washington Farm Bureau - Positions | 75% |
Business and Consumers
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Education
Employment and Affirmative Action
| 2007 | JobMakers - Job Creation Score | 29% |
| 2006 | JobMakers - Job Creation Score | 29% |
Environment
| 2015-2016 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions | 100% |
| 2015-2016 | Washington Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores | 96% |
| 2013-2014 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions | 100% |
| 2013-2014 | Washington Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score | 95% |
| 2011-2012 | Washington Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score | 94% |
| 2011-2012 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions | 90% |
| 2010 | Washington Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score | 95% |
| 2009-2010 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions | 89% |
| 2007-2008 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation | 100 |
| 2006 | Washington Sierra Club - Positions | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions | 92% |
| 2005 | Washington Sierra Club - Positions | 95% |
| 2003-2004 | Washington Conservation Voters - Positions | 100% |
Fiscally Conservative
Government Operations
Guns
Labor Unions
Marriage, Family, and Children
| 2014 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2013 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Children's Alliance - Positions | 93% |
| 2009 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 93% |
| 2008 | Children's Alliance - Positions on Child and Youth Issues | 100 |
| 2008 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Children's Alliance - Positions on Child and Youth Issues | 100 |
| 2005 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2004 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | Children's Campaign Fund - Positions | 100% |
Socially Conservative
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
