"Governor" Peter Shumlin of Vermont, a Democrat, allegedly is a "fraud", and after having allegedly rigged the vote count, he allegedly paid off the Vermont Secretary of State, Deborah Markowitz, who allegedly changed the actual vote count, by giving her a high paid appointed position.
They haven't been charged with any crime. Is Vermont more corrupt than any other state, so corrupt that alleged crime can go publicly rewarded?
Thousands of votes were allegedly stolen from candidate Cris Ericson, which you can see by the difference in the unofficial election results collected, and then the official results released to the news media.
Once the unofficial results were tabulated, it was clear that no candidate had received a majority of the vote.
Under Vermont law, when that happens, the full state legislative body must vote on a ballot with the names of the three candidates who received the most votes.
By changing the vote count, instead of Cris Ericson's name being on that ballot, Dennis Steele's name was listed.
If Cris Ericson's name had been listed, then some of the state legislators may have voted for her, and that may have changed the outcome, giving the most votes for Governor to the Republican candidate, Brian Dubie.
Cris Ericson would not have won, but by allegedly stealing votes from her, and not putting her name on the ballot the full state legislative body was required to vote on because no candidate received a
majority of the vote, the correct outcome is unknown.
Unless the stolen votes are recovered by finding out who may have hacked into the system, who may
have been paid off, and who may be guilty of alleged voter fraud, it is not appropriate or legally correct allegedly, for Peter Shumlin to act as Governor of Vermont.
The person or persons who allegedly committed this voter fraud should be discovered and then the full state legislature should be required to vote again for Governor because no candidate received a majority of the vote, and the vote that was taken by the state legislative body was allegedly based on voter fraud.
Just look at the difference in the two vote counts from unofficial, when someone realized no candidate
had a majority of the vote, to the official results which give an allegedly weaker candidate the third place.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Deborah Markowitz (Democrat) was Secretary of State at the time and in control, and therefore she allegedly should be charged with vote fraud for cutting Cris Ericson's votes for Governor and for U.S. Senate in half! Cris Ericson was on the ballot for both offices.
Peter Shumlin (DEMOCRAT) allegedly rewarded Deborah Markowitz (DEMOCRAT) for her alleged vote fraud by giving her an extremely high paying job in his administration, which she now holds.
Are Peter Shumlin (DEMOCRAT) and Deborah Markowitz (DEMOCRAT) criminals, and if so, under what federal codes and statutes?