Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Public Statements

Issue Position: End Corporate Personhood

Issue Position

Location: Unknown

The Supreme Court's decision in Citizen's United has opened the floodgates of corporate money and influence pouring into the electoral system. It has also generated a flood of mail calling for a constitutional amendment declaring, "human rights are only for human beings."

The Citizen's United decision is wrong and has opened a Pandora's Box of corporate election buying. It elevates the role of money in political speech under the First Amendment to an absurd extreme. However, I am not convinced that amending the United States Constitution is the right way to address the problem. It is a very lengthy process with an uncertain outcome. The problem is not with the First Amendment; the problem is this particular Supreme Court's interpretation.

Rather than focus on amending the United States Constitution, I believe there are a number of steps we should take at this time to tighten up our campaign reporting laws to increase public knowledge of the source of funds. I also believe shareholders should have more knowledge and control over corporate contributions to political campaigns. Congress should act in this area, as should the Colorado legislature.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top