Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Public Statements

Executive Session

Floor Speech

Location: Washington, DC


Mr. VITTER. Mr. President. I oppose the nomination of Andrew Hurwitz to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals because I have serious concerns with his capability to serve in the role of a life-tenured Federal appellate judge. His public statements regarding, and past contributions to, previous Supreme Court decisions give serious pause as to whether we should confirm him to serve on a Federal appellate court.

Mr. Hurwitz has effectively taken credit for helping develop the legal architecture for Roe v. Wade while serving as a law clerk to then-Judge Jon Newman. Judge Newman, a U.S. District Judge for the District of Connecticut, issued two 1972 decisions which are clearly reflected and expanded upon in the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade. Mr. Hurwitz played a key role in authoring these decisions and he has publicly expressed great pride in this fact. He wrote a 2002 law review article praising Roe and bragged that he helped craft Newman's opinion that was reflected in ``almost perfect lockstep'' in the Supreme Court's decision. This concerns me because not only is Roe a constitutional abomination, but a moral abomination that has resulted in the killing of tens of millions of unborn children.

Mr. Hurwitz has claimed credit for shaping a judicial decision that fundamentally disrespected human life and is completely unfounded in the Constitution. Roe v. Wade forever changed the debate about abortion in this country by creating a nationwide policy of abortion-on-demand through one of the worst cases of judicial activism in history. It is so poorly reasoned that both conservative and liberal legal experts and scholars acknowledge that Roe was a deficient opinion that lacks any legitimate legal reasoning in support of its holding.

His willful failure to recognize the legal deficiencies of the Roe opinion and his self-promotion for playing a part in such an unfortunate event in this country's judicial history makes clear that he is not qualified to serve in the role of a Federal appellate judge.

I believe we must support the dignity and sanctity of all human life and defend those who cannot defend themselves. This judicial nominee would do the opposite, which is why I must oppose Andrew Hurwitz's nomination to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top