Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Public Statements

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011

Location: Washington, DC

* Mr. SPRATT. Mr. Chairman, I support the provisions in this bill that support a second engine for the F-35.

* The Air Force will soon shift its air-to-ground, air-to-air, and air-supremacy roles to the F-35, and the F-35 will eventually number more than a thousand jet fighters, or 95 percent of the fighter force structure.

* To power these aircraft, the Air Force will require some 2500-3000 engines at a cost of more than $100 billion.

* We are fortunate to have two excellent engine manufacturers, Pratt Whitney and GE. Both started out as candidates for the F-35 engine.

* The question now comes: Do we need and want a second engine, produced by GE?

* More specifically--

* Do we want to sole source, run this program out 25 years or more, without price competition?

* In addition to price competition, do we want competition on innovation, reliability, and durability?

* Do we want to run the operational risk of having no back-up if problems show up in one engine?

* Do we want to keep competition in the defense production base?

* A second engine for the F-35 makes sense and saves money.

* I urge the House to leave intact the second engine provisions in the defense authorization bill before us today.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top