Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

Floor Speech

Date: March 15, 2024
Location: Washington, DC

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Ms. LOFGREN. Mr. Speaker, my intended vote against H.R. 7521 must not imply I do not have concerns about cybersecurity in the U.S. but, rather, that I have concerns regarding this specific bill.

This bill's narrow focus on TikTok (which seems well-intentioned by my colleagues) overlooks the expansive landscape of U.S. cybersecurity threats. Adversaries like China unfortunately possess a multitude of channels through which they can harvest Americans' sensitive personal information. Banning a single app does not come close to adequately safeguarding our country's cyber landscape. Congress should enact a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy that fully addresses how our digital infrastructure can be compromised. Additionally, there is an urgent need for digital privacy protections. Rep. Anna Eshoo and I introduced the Online Privacy Act that would provide far more robust digital protections for Americans than those in this bill that could result in the American ban of TikTok.

Relatedly, the one-off focus on TikTok for potential algorithm manipulation is imbalanced, as the actions cited are widespread practices across the social media landscape. It is not wise to single out one platform for an industry-wide problem. The support for this bill in the House suggests a need for a more equitable and holistic approach to social media regulation.

If there are genuine national security concerns from my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, I also question why House Republican leadership brought this bill to the Floor before having us vote for urgently needed Ukraine aid. Smart national security policy must include not only the cyber realm, but also strong democratic international alliances.

Compounding these strategic concerns are possible First Amendment violations. There have been various legal challenges to similar state- level legislation, and this bill could infringe upon free speech rights. There must be a delicate balance struck between ensuring security and preserving Americans' fundamental freedoms. I would have preferred having more time to debate, scrutinize, and amend this bill before voting on it. I hope the Senate process varies from that in the House before this bill becomes law.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT


Source
arrow_upward