Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Joe Pitts 93%
Todd Platts 89%
Richard Pombo 100%
Earl Pomeroy 37%
Jon Porter, Sr. 93%
Deborah Pryce 93%
Mark Pryor 100%
Adam Putnam 89%
George Radanovich 93%
Nick Rahall II 52%
James Ramstad 96%
Charlie Rangel 19%
Ralph Regula 96%
Denny Rehberg 96%
Harry Reid 53%
Richard Renzi 86%
Silvestre Reyes 26%
Thomas Reynolds 96%
Jay Rockefeller IV 53%
Mike Rogers 89%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 19%
Jim Ryun 100%
Martin Olav Sabo 33%
Loretta Sanchez 33%
Rick Santorum 60%
Paul Sarbanes 53%
Jim Saxton 82%
John Shadegg 78%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 89%
Christopher Shays 85%
Donald Sherwood 96%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 89%
Ike Skelton 52%
Louise Slaughter 33%
Gordon Smith 87%
Olympia Snowe 80%
Vic Snyder 33%
Mark Souder 89%
Arlen Specter 47%
John Spratt, Jr. 37%
Pete Stark 19%
Cliff Stearns 78%
Ted Stevens 73%
Ted Strickland 26%
Bart Stupak 30%
John Sullivan 90%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 82%
James Talent 100%
Tom Tancredo 74%
John Tanner 48%
Ellen Tauscher 44%
Charles Taylor 89%
Gene Taylor 44%
Lee Terry 93%
Craig Thomas 93%
William Thomas 96%
Todd Tiahrt 93%
Pat Tiberi 92%
John Tierney 33%
Ed Towns 26%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 33%
Mark Udall 30%
George Voinovich 80%
James Walsh 82%
Zach Wamp 96%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 39%
Mel Watt 33%
Henry Waxman 19%
Anthony Weiner 33%
David Weldon 85%
W. Curtis Weldon 89%
Gerald Weller 96%
Robert Wexler 19%
Ed Whitfield 89%
Heather Wilson 89%
Frank Wolf 89%
Lynn Woolsey 26%
David Wu 33%
Albert Wynn 48%
Bill Young 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top