Rating Group: Connecticut AFL-CIO

1994 Lifetime Score

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
CT U.S. House-1 John Larson D 74%
CT U.S. House-2 Joe Courtney D 86%
CT Lieutenant Governor Nancy Wyman D 85%
CT State House-33 Joseph Serra D 78%
CT State House-69 Art O'Neill R 29%
CT State House-76 John Piscopo R 41%
CT State House-85 Mary Mushinsky D 92%
CT State House-92 Patricia Dillon D 84%
CT State House-110 Bob Godfrey D 89%
CT State House-115 Stephen Dargan D 75%
CT State House-139 Kevin Ryan D 70%
CT State Senate-1 John Fonfara D 75%
CT State Senate-6 Terry Gerratana D 80%
CT State Senate-7 John Kissel R 50%
CT State Senate-11 Martin Looney D 56%
CT State Senate-15 Joan Hartley D 79%
CT State Senate-35 Anthony Guglielmo R 44%
CT Attorney General George Jepsen Other 67%
CT Secretary of State Denise Merrill Other 75%
CT Commissioner of Revenue Kevin Sullivan D 71%
CT Mayor-At-Large Toni Harp D 78%
CT Mayor Pro Tempore-At-Large Peter Nystrom R 69%
James Amann 55%
Curtis Dickerman Andrews, Jr. 21%
William Aniskovich 53%
Terrance Backer 80%
Timothy Barth 10%
Nancy Farwell Beals 70%
Reginald Beamon 81%
Richard Belden 25%
John Betkoski III 75%
Donald Boughton III 60%
Dominic Andrew Buonocore 10%
Susan Bysiewicz 70%
Larry Cafero, Jr. 10%
Michael Caron 45%
Annette Wheeler Carter 80%
Christopher Caruso 65%
Ilia Castro 75%
J.Vincent Chase 43%
Dennis Cleary 20%
Jacqueline Cocco 72%
Thomas Colapietro, Jr. 67%
Eric Coleman 83%
Raymond Collins 38%
Terry Concannon 60%
Thomas Conway, Sr. 73%
Catherine Cook 22%
Joe Crisco, Jr. 44%
Melody Currey 70%
Eileen Daily 44%
Ann Dandrow 67%
Jefferson Davis 70%
Louis DeLuca 20%
Nancy DeMarinis 80%
Chris Anthony DePino 65%
Konstantinos Diamantis 78%
William DiBella 79%
Lucien DiMeo 10%
Christopher Donovan 80%
William Dyson 86%
M. Adela Dell' Eads 39%
Mary Eberle 50%
Lou Esposito 60%
Ruth Fahrbach 26%
Robert Farr 36%
Michael Fedele 20%
Richard Ferrari 25%
Brian Flaherty 46%
Patrick Flaherty 70%
James Fleming 38%
John Wayne Fox 74%
Judith Freedman 53%
Mary Fritz 73%
Josephine Fuchs 42%
Angelo Fusco 79%
Edna Garcia 67%
Edwin Garcia 60%
Jeanne Garvey 10%
Frederick Gelsi 93%
Robert Genuario 44%
Edward Graziani 70%
George Gunther 36%
Norma Gyle 37%
Marilyn Ann Hess 20%
Sidney Holbrook 36%
Wade Hyslop, Jr. 84%
Andrea Jackson-Brooks 70%
Michael Jarjura 33%
Stephen Jarmoc 56%
Robert Keeley, Jr. 70%
Marie Lopez Kirkley-Bey 89%
Paul Knierim 20%
Alex Knopp 84%
Barry Kolar 22%
Michael Lawlor 86%
Gary LeBeau 60%
John Joseph Lescoe 88%
Janet Lockton 30%
Fred Lovegrove, Jr. 51%
Moira Lyons 79%
Robert Maddox, Jr. 37%
James Maloney 82%
Brian Edward Mattiello 20%
Dom Mazzoccoli 10%
James McCavanagh 69%
Anne McDonald 65%
Mary McGrattan 38%
Peter Metz 30%
Steve Mikutel 22%
Lawrence Miller 21%
John Mordasky 62%
Paul Munns 53%
Ernest Newton II 91%
William Nickerson 50%
Andrew McCall Norton 43%
Gary Orefice 50%
James O'Rourke III 80%
Mary Ann O'Sullivan 60%
Alvin Penn 44%
Melodie Peters 78%
Claudia Powers 0%
F. Prelli 25%
David Pudlin 92%
Dale Radcliffe 41%
Jodi Rell 40%
Kevin Ferguson Rennie 43%
Thomas Ritter 92%
Richard Roy 40%
Sammy Samowitz 79%
Ronald San Angelo 10%
Americo Santiago 83%
Pam Sawyer 10%
Ellen Scalettar 60%
Angelina Scarpetti 42%
Carl Schiessl 69%
Howard Scipio 60%
Donnie Sellers, Sr. 67%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 22%
Winthrop Smith, Jr. 22%
Stephen Somma 56%
Cameron Staples 80%
Andrea Stillman 67%
Jessie Stratton 66%
John Stripp 0%
Anthony Tercyak 25%
John Thompson 85%
Vincent Tonucci 67%
Christel Truglia 83%
Richard Tulisano 84%
Thomas Upson 62%
William Varese 34%
Peter Villano 60%
Robert Ward 43%
Julia Wasserman 16%
Donald Williams, Jr. 44%
Lenny Winkler 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.