Rating Group: Virginia AFL-CIO

1999 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House-4 Donald McEachin D 100%
VA U.S. House-9 Morgan Griffith R 42%
VA State House-1 Terry Kilgore R 83%
VA State House-13 Bob Marshall R 44%
VA State House-22 Kathy Byron R 0%
VA State House-25 Steve Landes R 10%
VA State House-28 William Howell R 34%
VA State House-36 Ken Plum D 89%
VA State House-39 Vivian Watts D 90%
VA State House-42 David Albo R 33%
VA State House-54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. R 57%
VA State House-62 Riley Ingram R 50%
VA State House-65 Lee Ware, Jr. R 20%
VA State House-66 Kirk Cox R 31%
VA State House-76 Chris Jones R 0%
VA State Senate-3 Thomas Norment, Jr. R 19%
VA State Senate-5 Lionell Spruill, Sr. D 100%
VA State Senate-7 Frank Wagner R 36%
VA State Senate-13 Richard Hayden Black R 20%
VA State Senate-15 Frank Ruff, Jr. R 33%
VA State Senate-18 Louise Lucas D 88%
VA State Senate-21 John Edwards D 100%
VA State Senate-23 Stephen Newman R 14%
VA State Senate-24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. R 14%
VA State Senate-25 Creigh Deeds D 90%
VA State Senate-32 Janet Howell D 85%
VA State Senate-35 Dick Saslaw D 80%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 27%
VA Mayor-At-Large Dwight Jones 100%
VA State Board of Education James Dillard II 68%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 66%
James Frederick Almand 86%
Ward Armstrong 90%
Thomas Graham Baker, Jr. 89%
William Barlow 70%
Warren Barry 52%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 100%
Irving Vincent Behm, Jr. 42%
William Welden Bennett, Jr. 77%
Harry Blevins 80%
Robert Bloxom 29%
Bill Bolling 0%
Robert Brink 100%
L. Bryant, Jr. 40%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 50%
Eric Cantor 10%
John Chichester 27%
Mary Taylor Christian 91%
Whittington Whiteside Clement 58%
Charles Colgan, Sr. 77%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 59%
Emily Couric 71%
Charles Cranwell 84%
Flora Davis Crittenden 89%
Glenn Croshaw 50%
L. Karen Darner 86%
Butch Davies III 45%
Jo Ann Davis 60%
Barnie Day 75%
Jay Wayne DeBoer 88%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 60%
Alan Arnold Diamonstein 67%
Vivian Earl Dickinson 56%
Thelma Drake 30%
Allen Wayne Dudley 17%
Randy Forbes 45%
Joseph Gartlan, Jr. 83%
George Wallace Grayson 83%
Andy Guest, Jr. 34%
Franklin Hall 82%
Phillip Hamilton 43%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 47%
Paul Clinton Harris, Sr. 0%
Charles Hawkins 24%
Richard Joyner Holland 54%
Edd Houck 83%
Robert Hull 96%
Thomas Micajah Jackson, Jr. 76%
Johnny Joannou 100%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 89%
Jerrauld Jones 87%
Jay Kenneth Katzen 25%
Gladys Brown Keating 86%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 90%
Henry Marsh III 92%
Stephen Martin 27%
Madison Ellis Marye 64%
W. Henry Maxwell 87%
Joe May 46%
Roger John McClure 23%
Bob McDonnell 33%
Michéle McQuigg 40%
Kenneth Melvin 91%
Kevin Grey Miller 27%
Yvonne Miller 93%
Brian Moran 90%
Harvey Morgan 29%
Thomas Warren Moss, Jr. 77%
William Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 65%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 20%
Harry Parrish 38%
Clarence Phillips 94%
Harry Potts, Jr. 35%
Phillip Puckett 100%
Toddy Puller 83%
Bob Purkey 26%
Lacey Putney 50%
Frederick Quayle 42%
John Spence Reid 21%
William Reynolds 79%
Anne Gregory Rhodes 41%
William Peters Robinson, Jr. 90%
John Adams Rollison III 29%
John Howson Rust, Jr. 63%
Edward Schrock 0%
James Scott 73%
Beverly Sherwood 25%
James Shuler 83%
Kenneth Stolle 31%
Walter Stosch 19%
Jackie Thomas Stump 94%
Robert Tata 41%
John Harvey Tate, Jr. 90%
Alfred Victor Thomas 74%
Patricia Ticer 100%
Malfourd Trumbo 86%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 92%
Mitchell Van Yahres 88%
Stanley Clay Walker 70%
William Wampler, Jr. 47%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 4%
John Watkins 23%
Glenn Weatherholtz 10%
Mary Margaret Whipple 71%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 29%
Donald Williams 100%
Martin Williams 14%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 82%
Jane Haycock Woods 47%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.