Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Bread for the World

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Thomas Reynolds 33%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 100%
Mike Rogers 33%
Mike Ross 100%
Steve Rothman 100%
Jim Ryun 33%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Loretta Sanchez 100%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 100%
Rick Santorum 100%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 0%
Edward Schrock 33%
John Shadegg 33%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 67%
Christopher Shays 67%
Donald Sherwood 67%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 67%
Ike Skelton 100%
Gordon Smith 100%
Nick Smith 33%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 100%
Mark Souder 67%
Arlen Specter 100%
John Spratt, Jr. 100%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 33%
Charles Stenholm 100%
Ted Stevens 100%
Ted Strickland 100%
Bart Stupak 100%
John Sullivan 0%
John Sununu 33%
John Sweeney 67%
Tom Tancredo 33%
John Tanner 100%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Tauzin II 33%
Charles Taylor 33%
Gene Taylor 33%
Lee Terry 33%
Craig Thomas 100%
William Thomas 33%
Todd Tiahrt 67%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 100%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
James Turner 100%
Mark Udall 100%
David Vitter 33%
George Voinovich 100%
James Walsh 67%
Zach Wamp 33%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 100%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 33%
W. Curtis Weldon 0%
Gerald Weller 67%
Robert Wexler 100%
Ed Whitfield 33%
Heather Wilson 67%
Frank Wolf 33%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 67%
Albert Wynn 100%
Bill Young 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top