Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana ACLU

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 11%
LA U.S. House 2 Cedric Richmond Democratic 78%
LA State House 4 Cedric Glover Democratic 50%
LA State House 72 Robby Carter Democratic 0%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 75%
LA State Senate 5 Karen Peterson Democratic 75%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 44%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 56%
LA State Senate 13 Dale Erdey Republican 33%
LA State Senate 14 Yvonne Colomb Democratic 88%
LA State Senate 19 Gary Smith, Jr. Democratic 33%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 50%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 33%
LA State Senate 28 Eric LaFleur Democratic 88%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 22%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 22%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 44%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Tarver, Sr. Democratic 43%
LA Parish President At-Large Errol Romero 29%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu 50%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 50%
LA Council Member At-Large Kip Holden 78%
LA Mayor President At-Large Sharon Broome Democratic 22%
Ernest Alexander 44%
Rodney Alexander 43%
Glenn Ansardi 56%
Diana Bajoie 100%
Robert Barham 25%
Clara Baudoin 0%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 86%
Ronald Bean 57%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 75%
Shirley Bowler 38%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 33%
Emile Bruneau 44%
James Cain 25%
Foster Campbell, Jr. 71%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 67%
Joel Chaisson II 86%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 57%
Carl Crane 33%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 75%
A. Crowe, Jr. 11%
Israel Curtis 71%
N. J. Damico 56%
William Daniel IV 63%
Jay Dardenne, Jr. 50%
Carla Dartez 38%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 88%
Emma Devillier 57%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 75%
John Diez 56%
Jean Doerge 44%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 13%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 25%
Sydnie Mae Durand 33%
Noble Ellington 38%
Rick Farrar 38%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 44%
Cleo Fields 100%
Wilson Fields 100%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 50%
Heulette Fontenot 0%
Mickey Frith 44%
Greg Fruge 44%
Mike Futrell 22%
Richard Gallot, Jr. 56%
Butch Gautreaux 57%
Kyle Mark Green 89%
Elcie Guillory 63%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 33%
Alexander Heaton 71%
Troy Hebert 14%
Francis Heitmeier 60%
Herman Ray Hill 33%
Donald Hines 67%
Ken Hollis 60%
Roy Hopkins 25%
Fred Hoyt 13%
Charles Irvin Hudson 43%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 67%
Nita Hutter 44%
Kay Iles 44%
Paulette Riley Irons 88%
Lydia Jackson 100%
Michael Jackson 57%
Jon Johnson 71%
Bill Jones 57%
Charles Jones 75%
Kay Katz 22%
Donald Kennard 25%
Lelon Kenney 25%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 0%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 25%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 33%
Arthur Lentini 0%
Leonard Lucas, Jr. 50%
Max Malone 0%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 100%
Jay Bowen McCallum 11%
Charles McDonald 29%
Joe McPherson 40%
Thomas McVea 22%
Michael Michot 0%
Billy Montgomery 67%
Willie Mount 38%
Edwin Murray 78%
Ben Nevers, Sr. 13%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 22%
Anthony Richard Perkins 22%
Wilfred Pierre 78%
Gillis Pinac 33%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 33%
Henry Powell 22%
Renee Gill Pratt 75%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 63%
Charles Riddle III 33%
Craig Romero 14%
Joe Salter 33%
Tom Schedler, Jr. 40%
Pete Schneider III 14%
Melinda Schwegmann 67%
B.L. Shaw 22%
Jack Smith 38%
Jane Smith 22%
Kenneth Smith 38%
Jennifer Sneed 33%
Victor Stelly 43%
Mike Strain 38%
Patrick Swilling 83%
Gerald Theunissen 0%
Jerry Thomas 25%
Joseph Toomy 44%
Thomas Townsend 57%
Warren Triche, Jr. 20%
Jim Tucker 0%
J. Chris Ullo 38%
Wayne Waddell 22%
Diane Winston 50%
Ernest Wooton 50%
Thomas Wright 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top