Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Christian Action Network

2004 Lifetime Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
Ed Pastor 9%
Ron Paul 62%
Donald Payne 22%
John Peterson 93%
Tom Petri 93%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 91%
Joe Pitts 91%
Todd Platts 62%
Richard Pombo 96%
Earl Pomeroy 59%
Jon Porter, Sr. 62%
Deborah Pryce 73%
Mark Pryor 36%
Adam Putnam 98%
George Radanovich 96%
Nick Rahall II 65%
James Ramstad 56%
Charlie Rangel 11%
Ralph Regula 74%
Denny Rehberg 96%
Harry Reid 54%
Richard Renzi 97%
Silvestre Reyes 31%
Thomas Reynolds 74%
Jay Rockefeller IV 12%
Mike Rogers 92%
Mike Ross 57%
Steve Rothman 14%
Jim Ryun 98%
Martin Olav Sabo 33%
Loretta Sanchez 6%
Rick Santorum 76%
Paul Sarbanes 3%
Jim Saxton 92%
John Shadegg 98%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 83%
Christopher Shays 42%
Donald Sherwood 81%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 41%
Ike Skelton 79%
Gordon Smith 67%
Olympia Snowe 36%
Vic Snyder 12%
Mark Souder 98%
Arlen Specter 77%
John Spratt, Jr. 31%
Pete Stark 2%
Cliff Stearns 99%
Ted Stevens 81%
Ted Strickland 37%
Bart Stupak 66%
John Sullivan 96%
John Sununu 80%
John Sweeney 72%
James Talent 72%
Tom Tancredo 95%
John Tanner 51%
Ellen Tauscher 6%
Charles Taylor 72%
Gene Taylor 60%
Lee Terry 93%
Craig Thomas 96%
William Thomas 78%
Todd Tiahrt 97%
John Tierney 5%
Ed Towns 10%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 22%
Mark Udall 11%
David Vitter 74%
George Voinovich 83%
James Walsh 93%
Zach Wamp 97%
John Warner 77%
Diane Watson 6%
Mel Watt 6%
Henry Waxman 7%
Anthony Weiner 8%
David Weldon 98%
W. Curtis Weldon 90%
Gerald Weller 89%
Robert Wexler 11%
Ed Whitfield 97%
Heather Wilson 91%
Frank Wolf 93%
Lynn Woolsey 5%
David Wu 39%
Albert Wynn 18%
Bill Young 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top