Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Montana Audubon

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 75%
MT State House 73 Jim Keane Democratic 92%
MT State Senate 2 Dee Brown Republican 25%
MT State Senate 5 Bob Keenan Republican 31%
MT State Senate 16 Frank Smith Democratic 67%
MT State Senate 50 Tom Facey Democratic 100%
MT Secretary of State Corey Stapleton Republican 25%
Joan Andersen 33%
Keith Bales 8%
Joe Balyeat 8%
Debby Barrett 8%
Norma Bixby 100%
Gary Branae 100%
Roy Brown 25%
John Brueggeman 17%
Edward Butcher 25%
Rosalie Buzzas 100%
Terrence Callahan 100%
Paul Clark 92%
John Cobb 33%
Vicki Cocchiarella 77%
Aubyn Curtiss 18%
Jon Ellingson 92%
Jim Elliott 77%
John Esp 17%
David Gallik 100%
Steven Gallus 92%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 100%
Kim Gillan 100%
George Golie 100%
Duane Grimes 31%
Gail Gutsche 100%
Dan Harrington 92%
Christopher Kirk Harris 92%
Dennis Himmelberger 33%
Verdell Jackson 17%
Hal Jacobson 100%
Joey Jayne 82%
Larry Jent 100%
Carol Juneau 100%
Christine Kaufmann 100%
Sam Kitzenberg 36%
Richard Laible 0%
Jesse Laslovich 92%
Ralph Lenhart 75%
Dave Lewis 42%
Monica Lindeen 83%
Jeff Mangan 83%
Gary Matthews 25%
Daniel McGee 17%
Joe McKenney 25%
John Musgrove 83%
Mark Noennig 50%
Alan Olson 17%
Jerry O'Neil 15%
Gerald Pease 92%
Holly Raser 100%
Diane Rice 0%
Rick Ripley 8%
Glenn Roush 62%
Don Ryan 85%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Jim Shockley 42%
Donald Steinbeisser 8%
Robert Story, Jr. 8%
Bill Tash 38%
Kenneth Toole, Jr. 100%
Joseph Tropila 83%
Karl Waitschies 25%
David Wanzenried 75%
John Witt 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top