Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Michigan League of Conservation Voters

2009-2010 Lifetime Score

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
MI U.S. House 3 Justin Amash Republican 0%
MI Lieutenant Governor Brian Calley Republican 30%
MI State House 2 Bettie Scott Democratic 85%
MI State Senate 1 Coleman Young II Democratic 97%
MI State Senate 10 Tory Rocca Republican 69%
MI State Senate 11 Vincent Gregory Democratic 100%
MI State Senate 12 James Marleau Republican 36%
MI State Senate 13 Martin Knollenberg Republican 29%
MI State Senate 18 Rebekah Warren Democratic 100%
MI State Senate 19 Michael Nofs Republican 0%
MI State Senate 21 John Proos IV Republican 33%
MI State Senate 24 Rick Jones Republican 37%
MI State Senate 25 Phil Pavlov Republican 21%
MI State Senate 26 Tonya Schuitmaker Republican 37%
MI State Senate 29 Dave Hildenbrand Republican 33%
MI State Senate 30 Arlan Meekhof Republican 26%
MI State Senate 32 Kenneth Horn Republican 30%
MI State Senate 34 Goeff Hansen Republican 43%
MI State Senate 35 Darwin Booher Republican 22%
MI State Senate 36 Jim Stamas Republican 17%
MI State Senate 37 Wayne Schmidt Republican 33%
MI Director of the Office of the State Budget John Walsh 28%
MI Council Member At-Large Bob Constan 100%
MI Council Member At-Large George Cushingberry, Jr. 87%
MI Council Member At-Large Gabriel Leland 96%
MI Council Member At-Large Mark Meadows Democratic 100%
MI Commissioner 3 Martha Scott 84%
MI Commissioner 5 Irma Clark-Coleman 87%
MI Commissioner 6 Eileen Kowall Republican 33%
MI Commissioner 9 Hugh Crawford Republican 17%
MI Commissioner 12 Glen Anderson 78%
MI Commissioner 14 Raymond Basham 94%
MI State Board of Education Tom McMillin Republican 0%
Dave Agema 9%
Jason Allen 25%
Glenn Anderson 100%
Kathy Angerer 100%
Richard Ball 52%
James Barcia 63%
Vicki Barnett 100%
Joan Bauer 100%
Douglas Bennett 77%
Patricia Birkholz 30%
Michael Bishop 20%
Timothy Bledsoe 100%
Jase Bolger 39%
Elizabeth Brater 93%
Cameron Brown 23%
Lisa Brown 100%
Terry Brown 79%
Pam Byrnes 96%
Barbara Byrum 93%
Nancy Cassis 25%
Bill Caul 24%
Deborah Cherry 89%
Hansen Clarke 93%
Ed Clemente 80%
Marc Corriveau 100%
Andrew Coulouris 97%
Alan Cropsey 21%
Kevin Daley 17%
Robert Dean 100%
Cynthia Denby 22%
Larry DeShazor 94%
Andy Dillon 76%
Marie Donigan 83%
Fred Durhal, Jr. 94%
Kate Ebli 97%
Kevin Elsenheimer 23%
John Espinoza 77%
Valdemar Garcia 26%
Douglas Geiss 100%
Bob Genetski 0%
Tom George 28%
Judson Gilbert II 20%
John Gleason 85%
Lee Gonzales 84%
Kevin Green 30%
Martin Griffin 57%
Jennifer Haase 100%
Gail Haines 89%
Richard Hammel 84%
Bill Hardiman 25%
Harold Haugh 94%
Joseph Haveman 17%
Michael Huckleberry 94%
Tupac Hunter 100%
Shanelle Jackson 72%
Gilda Jacobs 93%
Mark Jansen 16%
Ron Jelinek 30%
Bert Johnson 95%
Robert Jones 100%
Roger Kahn 17%
Andrew Kandrevas 89%
Deb Kennedy 100%
Wayne Kuipers 19%
Kenneth Kurtz 6%
Michael Lahti 94%
LaMar Lemmons, Jr. 90%
Steven Lindberg 100%
Ellen Lipton 100%
Lesia Liss 100%
Matt Lori 17%
Pete Lund 6%
Jeff Mayes 76%
Gary McDowell 92%
Michelle McManus 20%
Tim Melton 100%
Kim Meltzer 29%
Fred Miller 100%
Tim Moore 26%
Chuck Moss 36%
David Nathan 94%
Judy Nerat 89%
Andy Neumann 83%
Dennis Olshove 91%
Paul Opsommer 38%
John Pappageorge 21%
Bruce Patterson 42%
Thomas Pearce 22%
Gino Polidori 90%
Michael Prusi 92%
Randy Richardville 27%
Sarah Roberts 100%
Bill Rogers 33%
Alan Sanborn 28%
Roy Schmidt 94%
Paul Scott 72%
Daniel Scripps 100%
Kate Segal 100%
Joel Sheltrown 74%
Dian Slavens 100%
Jim Slezak 100%
Alma Smith 98%
Dudley Spade 64%
Tony Stamas 21%
Woodrow Stanley 100%
Jonathan Switalski 100%
Mickey Switalski 83%
Samuel Thomas III 88%
Rashida Tlaib 94%
Sharon Tyler 50%
Mary Valentine 100%
Gerald Van Woerkom 23%
Gretchen Whitmer 95%
Jimmy Womack 94%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top