Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Drug Policy Forum of California (DPFCA)

2005-2006 Positions

Issues: Drugs
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 5 Mike Thompson Democratic B
CA U.S. House 6 Doris Matsui Democratic B
CA U.S. House 12 Nancy Pelosi Democratic A
CA U.S. House 13 Barbara Lee Democratic A
CA U.S. House 16 Jim Costa Democratic C
CA U.S. House 18 Anna Eshoo Democratic A
CA U.S. House 19 Zoe Lofgren Democratic B
CA U.S. House 22 Devin Nunes Republican F
CA U.S. House 28 Adam Schiff Democratic C
CA U.S. House 30 Brad Sherman Democratic A
CA U.S. House 32 Grace Napolitano Democratic C
CA U.S. House 38 Linda Sánchez Democratic A
CA U.S. House 39 Ed Royce Republican C
CA U.S. House 40 Lucille Roybal-Allard Democratic A
CA U.S. House 42 Ken Calvert Republican F
CA U.S. House 43 Maxine Waters Democratic A
CA U.S. House 48 Dana Rohrabacher Republican A
CA U.S. House 49 Darrell Issa Republican F
CA U.S. House 53 Susan Davis Democratic A
CA Attorney General Xavier Becerra Democratic B
CA Supervisor 1 Hilda Solis B
Joe Baca, Sr. F
Howard Berman A
Brian Bilbray C
Mary Bono Mack F
John Campbell III C
Lois Capps A
Dennis Cardoza F
John Doolittle F
David Dreier F
Sam Farr A
Bob Filner A
Elton Gallegly F
Jane Harman B
Wally Herger, Jr. F
Mike Honda A
Duncan Hunter F
Tom Lantos A
Jerry Lewis F
Dan Lungren F
Buck McKeon F
Juanita Millender-McDonald A
Gary Miller F
George Miller A
Richard Pombo F
George Radanovich F
Loretta Sanchez B
Pete Stark A
Ellen Tauscher B
William Thomas F
Diane Watson A
Henry Waxman A
Lynn Woolsey A

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top