Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Drug Policy Forum of California (DPFCA)

2002 Positions on Drug Policy Reform

Issues: Drugs
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic B
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic D
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic B
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic C
CA State Senate 19 Hannah-Beth Jackson Democratic B
CA State Senate 36 Pat Bates Republican F
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic B
CA Supervisor 3 Wilma Chan B
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation B
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo B
CA Council Member 5 Paul Koretz A
CA Council Member 10 Herb Wesson, Jr. B
Samuel Aanestad F
Richard Alarcón B
Roy Ashburn D
Russell Bogh F
Debra Bowen A
John Campbell III F
Joseph Canciamilla A
Edward Chavez B
Wesley Chesbro A
David Cogdill F
Rebecca Cohn C
Ellen Corbett A
Dave Cox F
Lynn Daucher F
Manny Diaz B
Denise Ducheny B
Joe Dunn C
John Anthony Dutra B
Martha Escutia B
Liz Figueroa A
Marco Antonio Firebaugh B
Dean Florez F
Dario Frommer C
Jackie Goldberg A
Tom Harman F
Dennis Hollingsworth F
Jerome Horton B
Christine Kehoe A
Jay La Suer F
Mark Leno A
Robert Leslie F
Carol Liu B
John Longville A
Ken Maddox F
Abel Maldonado F
Barbara Matthews D
William Phillip Morrow D
Dennis Lee Mountjoy F
Kevin Murray A
George Nakano D
Joseph Nation A
Gloria Negrete McLeod B
Jenny Oropeza B
Deborah Ortiz B
Robert Pacheco F
Fran Pavley B
Charles Poochigian F
Sarah Reyes C
Keith Stuart Richman C
Gloria Romero A
Simón Salinas C
Nell Soto C
Tony Strickland F
Patricia Wiggins A
Mark Wyland D

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top