Rating Group: Associated Industries of Florida

2004 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
FL U.S. Senate-Jr Marco Rubio R 92%
FL U.S. House-5 Al Lawson, Jr. D 87%
FL U.S. House-8 Bill Posey R 91%
FL U.S. House-11 Daniel Webster R 85%
FL U.S. House-12 Gus Bilirakis R 90%
FL U.S. House-15 Dennis Ross R 100%
FL U.S. House-23 Debbie Wasserman Schultz D 84%
FL U.S. House-24 Frederica Wilson D 85%
FL State House-9 Loranne Ausley D 87%
FL State House-46 Bruce Antone D 100%
FL State House-52 Thad Altman R 92%
FL State House-83 Gayle Harrell R 90%
FL State Senate-4 Aaron Bean R 92%
FL State Senate-6 Audrey Gibson D 88%
FL State Senate-9 David Simmons R 93%
FL State Senate-12 Dennis Baxley R 94%
FL State Senate-20 Tom Lee R 83%
FL State Senate-21 Bill Galvano R 100%
FL State Senate-25 Joe Negron R 94%
FL State Senate-36 Rene Garcia R 100%
FL Chief Financial Officer Jeffrey Atwater R 87%
FL Mayor-At-Large John Seiler 80%
FL Council Member-3 Lee Constantine 90%
FL Commissioner-1 Sandra Murman 93%
FL Commissioner-2 Victor Crist 88%
FL Commissioner-3 Charlie Justice 80%
FL Commissioner-3 Lesley Miller, Jr. D 87%
FL Representative-At-Large Joyce Cusack D 79%
Sandy Adams 88%
J.D. Alexander 84%
Bob Allen 100%
Kevin Ambler 100%
Tom Anderson 89%
Nancy Argenziano 90%
Dave Aronberg 87%
Ralph Arza 91%
Frank Attkisson 100%
Carey Baker 92%
Gustavo Barreiro 91%
Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall 77%
Michael Bennett 95%
Allan George Bense 90%
Holly Benson 93%
Kim Berfield 92%
Ellyn Bogdanoff 96%
Marsha Bowen 100%
Mary Brandenburg 93%
Donald Brown 95%
Fredrick Brummer 94%
Phillip Brutus 67%
Susan Bucher 73%
Edward Bullard 90%
Larcenia Bullard 82%
Johnnie Byrd, Jr. 88%
Walter Campbell, Jr. 80%
Gaston Cantens 90%
Lisa Carlton 85%
Jennifer Carroll 92%
Donna Clarke 93%
Charles Clary 94%
Anna Cowin 87%
Larry Cretul 90%
Faye Culp 88%
Don Davis 92%
Mike Davis 89%
Mandy Dawson 86%
Charles Dean, Sr. 92%
Nancy Detert 93%
Alex Diaz de la Portilla 78%
Paula Dockery 81%
Carl Domino 100%
Greg Evers 88%
Frank Farkas 94%
Mike Fasano 88%
Terry Fields 94%
Heather Fiorentino 88%
Anne Gannon 100%
Rodolfo Garcia, Jr. 95%
Andy Gardiner 93%
Dan Gelber 67%
Steven Geller 83%
Hugh Gibson III 88%
J. Dudley Goodlette 89%
Kenneth Allan Gottlieb 60%
Carole Green 93%
Ronald Greenstein 85%
Mike Haridopolos 75%
James Harper, Jr. 92%
Lindsay Harrington 89%
Adam Hasner 100%
Bob Henriquez 93%
Anthony Hill, Sr. 65%
Wilbert Theodore Holloway 82%
Edward Homan, Jr. 92%
Edward Jennings, Jr. 73%
Randy Johnson 100%
Dennis Jones 86%
Stan Jordan 88%
Arthenia Joyner 85%
Jim Kallinger 93%
Will Kendrick 78%
Bev Kilmer 92%
James King, Jr. 100%
Ron Klein 89%
Suzanne Kosmas 67%
Jeff Kottkamp 91%
Dick Kravitz 93%
Bruce Kyle 91%
Ken Littlefield 100%
Marcelo Llorente 100%
Evelyn Lynn 88%
Richard Machek 88%
Mark Mahon 94%
Gwen Margolis 90%
Stan Mayfield 100%
Sheri McInvale 100%
Matthew Meadows 88%
David Mealor 100%
Dave Murzin 100%
Mitch Needelman 88%
Pat Patterson 100%
Jerry Paul 89%
Durell Peaden, Jr. 82%
Frank Peterman, Jr. 80%
Joe Pickens 100%
Juan-Carlos Planas 89%
Ralph Poppell 92%
Manuel Prieguez 89%
Ken Pruitt 93%
John Quiñones 85%
Ron Reagan 100%
Nan Rich 80%
Curtis Richardson 94%
Stacy Ritter 90%
David Rivera 89%
Julio Robaina 100%
Yolly Roberson 77%
Dave Russell, Jr. 92%
Timothy Ryan 78%
Ray Sansom 92%
Burt Saunders 90%
Jim Sebesta 92%
Gary Siplin 89%
Irving Slosberg 75%
Christopher Smith 100%
Rod Smith 90%
Eleanor Sobel 67%
Ken Sorensen 92%
Joseph Spratt 92%
Dwight Stansel 100%
John Stargel 94%
Donald Sullivan 100%
Baxter Troutman 91%
Rochelle Vana 92%
J. Alex Villalobos 82%
Leslie Waters 93%
Douglass Wiles 75%
Stephen Wise 88%
Roger Brian Wishner 83%
Juan Zapata 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.