Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Transportation Communications Union

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 11%
Tom Petri 11%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 11%
Joe Pitts 0%
Todd Platts 11%
Richard Pombo 11%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Jon Porter, Sr. 11%
Deborah Pryce 0%
Mark Pryor 83%
Adam Putnam 11%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 100%
James Ramstad 0%
Charlie Rangel 89%
Ralph Regula 11%
Denny Rehberg 11%
Harry Reid 80%
Richard Renzi 11%
Silvestre Reyes 100%
Thomas Reynolds 11%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Mike Rogers 11%
Mike Ross 100%
Steve Rothman 100%
Jim Ryun 11%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Loretta Sanchez 100%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 33%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 13%
Christopher Shays 22%
Donald Sherwood 11%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 44%
Ike Skelton 100%
Gordon Smith 17%
Olympia Snowe 50%
Vic Snyder 89%
Mark Souder 11%
Arlen Specter 40%
John Spratt, Jr. 100%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 11%
Ted Stevens 17%
Ted Strickland 100%
Bart Stupak 89%
John Sullivan 11%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 44%
James Talent 17%
Tom Tancredo 13%
John Tanner 100%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
Charles Taylor 0%
Gene Taylor 89%
Lee Terry 11%
Craig Thomas 17%
William Thomas 0%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 100%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
Mark Udall 100%
David Vitter 0%
George Voinovich 33%
James Walsh 22%
Zach Wamp 11%
John Warner 17%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 100%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 11%
Gerald Weller 13%
Robert Wexler 100%
Ed Whitfield 13%
Heather Wilson 11%
Frank Wolf 22%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Albert Wynn 89%
Bill Young 11%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top